陈效, 何飞宇, 钟志勇. 不同复位下交锁髓内钉内固定治疗股骨干骨折的有效性和安全性比较[J]. 蚌埠医科大学学报, 2018, 43(11): 1460-1462,1466. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2018.11.019
    引用本文: 陈效, 何飞宇, 钟志勇. 不同复位下交锁髓内钉内固定治疗股骨干骨折的有效性和安全性比较[J]. 蚌埠医科大学学报, 2018, 43(11): 1460-1462,1466. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2018.11.019
    CHEN Xiao, HE Fei-yu, ZHONG Zhi-yong. The effectiveness and safety comparison of the internal fixation combined with interlocking intramedullary nail under different reduction in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical University, 2018, 43(11): 1460-1462,1466. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2018.11.019
    Citation: CHEN Xiao, HE Fei-yu, ZHONG Zhi-yong. The effectiveness and safety comparison of the internal fixation combined with interlocking intramedullary nail under different reduction in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical University, 2018, 43(11): 1460-1462,1466. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2018.11.019

    不同复位下交锁髓内钉内固定治疗股骨干骨折的有效性和安全性比较

    The effectiveness and safety comparison of the internal fixation combined with interlocking intramedullary nail under different reduction in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures

    • 摘要: 目的:探讨不同复位下交锁髓内钉内固定治疗股骨干骨折的有效性和安全性。方法:收集71例股骨干骨折病人,根据不同复位方式分为切开复位组34例和闭合复位组37例。切开复位组行切开复位交锁髓内钉内固定治疗;闭合复位组行闭合复位交锁髓内钉内固定治疗。比较2组病人的手术指标,随访12个月后,比较2组病人的临床疗效和并发症发生率。结果:闭合复位组术中出血量、骨折愈合时间均明显少于切开复位组(P<0.01)。术后12、24、48、72 h,闭合复位组视觉模拟评分均低于切开复位组(P<0.05~P<0.01)。术后12个月,闭合复位组的临床疗效优于闭合组(P<0.05);闭合复位组并发症发生率为5.41%,低于切开复位组的23.53%(P<0.05)。结论:闭合复位交锁髓内钉内固定治疗股骨干骨折的疗效优于切开复位,并有助于促进病人骨折愈合和膝关节功能恢复,减少并发症发生。

       

      Abstract: Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of internal fixation combined with interlocking intramedullary nail under different reduction in the treatment of femoral shaft fractures.Methods: Seventy-one patients with femoral shaft fractures were divided into the open reduction group(n=34) and close reduction group(n=37) according to different reduction methods.The open reduction group and close reduction group were treated with open reduction combined with interlocking intramedullary nail fixation,and close reduction combined with interlocking intramedullary nail fixation,respectively.Two groups were followed up for 12 months.The operation index,clinical efficacy and complications were compared between two groups.Results: The intraoperative blood loss,fracture healing time in close reduction group were significantly lower than those in open reduction group(P<0.01).After 12h,24h,48h and 72h,the VAS scores in close reduction group were lower than that in open reduction group(P<0.05 to P<0.01).The clinical effect in close reduction group after 12 months of operation was better than that in open reduction group(P<0.05).The incidence rate of complication in reduction group(5.41%) was significantly lower than that in open reduction group(23.53%)(P<0.05).Conclusions: The effect of close reduction combined with interlocking intramedullary nail fixation in treating the femoral shaft fractures is better than that of open reduction.The close reduction combined with interlocking intramedullary nail fixation can promote the fracture healing and knee joint function recovery,and reduce the occurrence of complications.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回