贾喆. 小剂量阿替普酶在静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的神经保护作用[J]. 蚌埠医科大学学报, 2019, 44(7): 920-922, 926. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2019.07.020
    引用本文: 贾喆. 小剂量阿替普酶在静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的神经保护作用[J]. 蚌埠医科大学学报, 2019, 44(7): 920-922, 926. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2019.07.020
    JIA Zhe. Neuroprotective effects of the intravenous thrombolysis with a small dose alteplase in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical University, 2019, 44(7): 920-922, 926. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2019.07.020
    Citation: JIA Zhe. Neuroprotective effects of the intravenous thrombolysis with a small dose alteplase in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical University, 2019, 44(7): 920-922, 926. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2019.07.020

    小剂量阿替普酶在静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的神经保护作用

    Neuroprotective effects of the intravenous thrombolysis with a small dose alteplase in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke

    • 摘要:
      目的探讨小剂量阿替普酶(rt-PA)在静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的神经保护作用。
      方法将82例急性缺血性脑卒中病人按照rt-PA给药剂量随机分为对照组(39例)与观察组(43例);对照组给予常规剂量(0.9 mg/kg)rt-PA进行治疗,观察组给予小剂量(0.6 mg/kg)rt-PA进行治疗。比较2组治疗前后神经功能缺损评分(NHISS评分)、中国卒中量表(CSS)评分、生活能力(BI指数)评分以及不良反应发生情况。
      结果治疗后,2组病人NHISS评分及CSS评分均明显小于治疗前(P < 0.01),且观察组病人低于对照组(P < 0.01和P < 0.05);BI指数评分均明显高于治疗前(P < 0.01),但2组间BI指数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);对照组治疗后不良反应总发生率10.26%,与观察组的11.63%差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
      结论小剂量与常规剂量rt-PA均可有效治疗急性缺血性脑卒中,且对神经具有较好的保护作用,应在临床上进行推广,以提高药物经济学水平。

       

      Abstract:
      ObjectiveTo investigate the neuroprotective effects of the intravenous thrombolysis with a small dose alteplase(rt-PA) in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.
      MethodsEighty-two patients with acute ischemic stroke was divided into the control group(n=39) and observation group(n=45) according to the administration dosage of rt-PA.The control group were treated with conventional dose(0.9 mg/kg) of rt-PA, and the observation group were treated with small dose(0.6 mg/kg) of rt-PA.The neurological deficit score(NHISS score), CSS score and BI index score before and after treatment, and incidence of adverse reactions between two groups were compared.
      ResultsAfter treatment, the scores of NHISS and CSS in two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment(P < 0.01), which in observation group was lower than that in control group(P < 0.05 and P < 0.01).After treatment, the scores of BI index in two groups were significantly higher than that before treatment(P < 0.01), and the difference of which between two groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05).The total incidence rates of adverse reactions in control group and observation group after treatment were 10.26% and 11.63%, respectively, and the difference of which between two groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05).
      ConclusionsBoth small-dose and conventional dose rt-PA in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke are effective, which has a good protective effect on nerve.It should be clinically practiced in order to improve the level of pharmacoeconomics.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回