紧急事件应激晤谈联合认知行为干预对重度烧伤病人心理康复的效果研究

    Study on critical incident stress debriefing combined with cognitive behavior intervention on the psychological rehabilitation in patients with severe burn

    • 摘要:
      目的探讨紧急事件应急晤谈(CISD)联合认知行为干预对重度烧伤病人心理康复的效果。
      方法将116例重度烧伤病人随机分为观察组和对照组,每组58例,2组病人均给予常规干预,在此基础上观察组病人给予CISD联合认知行为干预。比较2组病人干预前后的心理健康状况、应对策略、创伤后成长及幸福感评分情况。
      结果干预前,2组病人心理健康状况、应对策略、创伤后成长及幸福感评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后,观察组病人的躯体化、人际关系、抑郁、焦虑、敌对维度评分和心理健康状况总分均低于干预前及对照组(P < 0.05~P < 0.01);面对维度评分高于干预前及对照组(P < 0.01),回避、屈服维度评分低于干预前及对照组(P < 0.01);回避、屈服维度评分低于干预前及对照组(P < 0.01);人际关系、新可能性、精神改变、欣赏生活和创伤后成长总评分均高于干预前及对照组(P < 0.05~P < 0.01);对健康担心、感情行为控制、幸福感总评分高于干预前及对照组(P < 0.01)。
      结论CISD联合认知行为干预能够有效缓解重度烧伤病人的心理障碍,促进康复,值得推广应用。

       

      Abstract:
      ObjectiveTo explore the effects of critical incident stress debriefing(CISD) combined with cognitive behavior intervention on psychological rehabilitation in patients with severe burn.
      MethodsOne hundred and sixteen patients with severe burn were randomly divided into the observation group and control group(58 cases each group).Two groups were treated with conventional intervention, and the observation group was additionally treated with CISD combined with cognitive behavior intervention.The mental health, coping strategies, post-traumatic growth and happiness score between two groups were compared before and after intervention.
      ResultsBefore intervention, there was not statistical significance in mental health, coping strategies, post-traumatic growth and happiness score between two groups(P>0.05).After intervention, the scores of somatization, interpersonal relationship, depression, anxiety and hostility, and total score of mental health in observation group were lower than those before intervention, and in control group after intervention(P < 0.05 to P < 0.01).After intervention, the score of facing dimension in observation group was higher than that before intervention, and in control group after intervention(P < 0.01), and the scores of avoiding and yielding dimensions in observation group were lower than those before intervention, and in control group after intervention(P < 0.01).After intervention, the total score of interpersonal relationship, new possibilities, spiritual change, appreciation of life and post-traumatic growth, and total score of health concerns, emotional behavior control and happiness in observation group were higher than those before intervention, and in control group after intervention(P < 0.05 to P < 0.01).
      ConclusionsCISD combined with cognitive behavioral intervention can effectively relieve the psychological disorders, and promote the rehabilitation of patients.It is worthy of promotion.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回