动脉硬度指数与冠心病及其严重程度的相关性

    Correlation of arterial stiffness index with coronary heart disease and its severity

    • 摘要: 目的:探讨动脉硬度指数(ASI)与冠心病及其严重程度的相关性。方法:纳入535例疑似或确诊为冠心病病人,根据冠状动脉造影结果,分为对照组(无明显冠状动脉病变)、单支血管病变组和多支血管病变组(血管病变支数≥2支)。同时根据冠状动脉造影、心肌酶谱、心电图、心脏彩超和临床表现等结果,将病人分为对照组、稳定性心绞痛(SA)组,不稳定性心绞痛(UA)组和急性心肌梗死(AMI)组。收集所有研究对象的一般资料及相关实验室指标,并使用动脉硬度测量仪测量ASI水平。比较不同分组病人ASI水平及相关指标的差异,并采用受试者工作曲线(ROC曲线)分析ASI对冠心病的诊断及评估其严重程度的价值。结果:随着冠状动脉血管病变支数的增加,ASI也随之升高(P<0.01); SA组、UA组和AMI组ASI值均高于对照组(P<0.05~P<0.01),且UA组和AMI组ASI值高于SA组(P<0.01),但UA和AMI组ASI值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);ROC曲线分析结果显示ASI诊断冠心病的敏感度为69.7%,特异度为85.4%,评估冠心病的严重程度的敏感度为74.6%,特异度为58.3%。结论:ASI对于辅助诊断冠心病及评估其严重程度均具有一定的参考价值。

       

      Abstract: Objective: To explore the correlation between arterial stiffness index (ASI) and coronary heart disease and its severity. Methods: A total of 535 patients suspected or diagnosed as coronary heart disease (CHD) were included and divided into control group (without obvious coronary artery disease),single-vessel disease group,and multi-vessel disease group (with ≥2 vessel disease branches) based on the results of coronary angiography.According to the results of coronary angiography,myocardial enzyme spectrum,electrocardiogram,echocardiography and clinical manifestations,these patients were divided into control group,stable angina (SA) group,unstable angina (UA) group and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) group.The general information and relevant laboratory indicators of all study subjects were collected,and the ASI levels were measured using an arterial hardness tester.The differences in ASI levels and related indicators were compared in these groups,and the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was used to analyze ASI value in the diagnosis and assessment of CHD severity. Results: With the increase of coronary artery lesions numbers,ASI was increased (P<0.01),the ASI values in SA,UA and AMI groups were all higher than those in control group (P<0.05 to P<0.01),and the ASI values in UA and AMI groups were higher than those in SA group (P<0.01).However,there was no statistical difference of ASI values between the UA and AMI groups (P>0.05).The ROC curve analysis results showed that the sensitivity and specificity of ASI in diagnosing CHD were 69.7% and 85.4%,respectively.The sensitivity and specificity for evaluating the severity of CHD were 74.6% and 58.3%,respectively. Conclusions: ASI has a certain reference value for assisting in the diagnosis of CHD and evaluating its severity.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回