肺部超声对评估高流量氧疗联合俯卧位治疗轻中度急性呼吸窘迫综合征病人的疗效评估

    Evaluation of the effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy combined with prone position on mild to moderate ARDS by pulmonary ultrasound

    • 摘要:
      目的 探讨高流量氧疗联合俯卧位对轻中度急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)病人疗效, 并采用肺部超声进行评估。
      方法 选择轻中度ARDS病人32例给予高流量氧疗联合俯卧位治疗, 观察俯卧位前后动脉血气分析、肺部超声评分(LUS)、血流动力学指标(心率、平均动脉压)等情况。根据俯卧位后氧合指数改善是否超过20%定义为对俯卧位是否有反应, 并分为有反应组(22例)和无反应组(10例), 比较2组病人一般临床指标、超声评分变化。
      结果 共纳入32例病人。有反应组肺内病变占比明显低于无反应组, 有反应组白细胞介素-6水平、体质量指数水平明显高于无反应组(P < 0.01)。病人俯卧位前后氧分压、氧合指数、呼吸频率、LUS腹侧、LUS背侧差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。俯卧位前有反应组背侧评分比无反应组高, 腹侧评分比无反应组低(P < 0.01), 俯卧位后有反应组背侧、腹侧评分均较无反应组低(P < 0.01)。
      结论 清醒俯卧位能够改善轻中度ARDS的氧合反应, 肺部超声无法预测俯卧位治疗后的氧合反应, 但可以监测俯卧位期间的通气变化。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy combined with prone position on mild to moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS) by pulmonary ultrasound.
      Methods Thirty-two patients with mild to moderate ARDS were enrolled as study subjects who received high flow oxygen therapy combined with prone position.The arterial blood gas, pulmonary ultrasonic score (LUS), hemodynamic indexes (heart rate, mean arterial pressure) before and after prone position were collected.When the percutaneous oxygen saturation(SpO2)of patient elevated more than 20% after prone positioning was defined as a positive response.According to this criteria, all patients were divided into responsive group (n=22) and non-responsive group (n=10).The changes of general clinical indexes, ultrasonic score of the two groups were compared.
      Results A total of 32 patients were included.The proportion of pulmonary lesions in the responsive group was significantly lower than that in the non-responsive group, and the levels of interleukin-6 and body mass index in the responsive group were significantly higher than those in the non-responsive group (P < 0.01).There were statistically significant differences in PaO2, PaO2/FiO2, RR, LUSventral, and LUSdorsalbetween before and after prone position (P < 0.01).The dorsal score of the responsive group before prone position was higher than that of the non-responsive group, while the ventral score was lower than that of the non-responsive group (P < 0.01).The dorsal and ventral scores of the responsive group after prone position were lower than those of the non-responsive group (P < 0.01).
      Conclusions Conscious prone position can improve oxygenation in mild to moderate ARDS.Pulmonary ultrasound cannot predict oxygenation after treatment in prone position, but can monitor ventilation changes during prone position.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回