电化学发光与酶免疫分析检测HBsAg的比较

    Comparison between ECLIA and ELISA in measurement of HBsAg

    • 摘要: 目的: 比较电化学发光(ECLIA)和酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测HBsAg的结果。方法: 选择HBsAg阳性标准品和99例4种模式样本①HBsAg(+)/HBeAg(+)/HBcAb(+);②HBsAg(+)/HBeAb(+)/HBcAb(+);③HBsAg(+)/HBcAb(+);④HBeAg(+) HBcAb(+),分别采用ECLIA和ELISA一步法、二步法检测HBsAg。结果: ECLIA的日内CV比ELISA一步法、二步法分别提高3.3%和3.2%,日间CV分别提高3.5%和3.3%,敏感度各为0.063、0.5和0.25ng/ml。①②③模式3种方法HBsAg100%阳性率。④模式2例ECLIA1:50稀释和ELISA二步法为阳性,而ECLIA原倍和ELISA一步法为阴性。①模式1:50稀释后的HBsAgCOI值比原倍血清高。结论: ELISA一步法检测HBsAg,简便快速,标本的含量较低或浓度过高可出现假阴性。为避免一步法Hook效应造成的假阴性,可采用经典的两步法。ECLIA灵敏度高,但也存在Hook效应,必要时应稀释标本进行检测或进行中和确证试验。

       

      Abstract: Objective: To compare the results of serum HBsAg detection by eletrochemiluminescence immunoassay(ECLIA) and enzyme-linked immunobsorbent assay(ELISA).Methods: ECLIA and one-step and two-step ELISA were used to detect quantitative HBsAg and 99 serum samples which were divided into four models:①HBsAg(+)/HBeAg(+)/HBcAb(+),②HBsAg(+)/HBeAb(+)/HBcAb(+),③HBsAg(+)/HBcAb(+),④HBeAg(+)/HBcAb(+).Results: The within-day CV by ECLIA increased 3.3% and 3.2% compared to by one-step ELISA and two-step ELISA alone;and the between-day CV by ECLIA increased 3.5% and 3.3%,and the sensitivity was 0.063,0.5 and 0.25ng/ml respectively.The positive ratio by ECLIA and one-step,two-step ELISA was 100% in model①②③.The result was positive in two samples of model④by ECLIA 1:50 dilute and two-step ELISA,while the result was negative by ECLIA undiluted and one-step ELISA.In model①,the level of 1:50 diluted HBsAg COI was higher than that of undiluted.Conclusions: One-step ELISA is simple and quick in detecting HBsAg,but too high or too low concentration of the sample may issue false negative.To avoid hook effect,two-step ELISA is recommended.ECLIA has a high sensitivity,but there also exists hook effect.Prediluting samples or Elecsys HBsAg confirmatory test should be adopted when necessary.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回