章敏姬. 2种新生儿脐带结扎方法的临床比较[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2011, 36(4): 363-365.
    引用本文: 章敏姬. 2种新生儿脐带结扎方法的临床比较[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2011, 36(4): 363-365.
    ZHANG Min-ji. Clinical comparison on two methods of clamping umbilical cord for neonates[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical College, 2011, 36(4): 363-365.
    Citation: ZHANG Min-ji. Clinical comparison on two methods of clamping umbilical cord for neonates[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical College, 2011, 36(4): 363-365.

    2种新生儿脐带结扎方法的临床比较

    Clinical comparison on two methods of clamping umbilical cord for neonates

    • 摘要: 目的: 比较脐带夹结扎与气门芯结扎的优缺点。方法: 随机抽取产科分娩新生儿中脐带夹法202例和气门芯法119例进行观察。结果: 气门芯组愈脐时间明显短于脐带夹组(P<0.05),且无脐部并发症出现。结论: 气门芯法明显优于脐带夹法,可减少脐炎发生,方便、有效、经济。

       

      Abstract: Objective: To compare the advantage and disadvantage of umbilical cord clip ligation and valve core ligation.Methods: The neonates who were randomly sampled including 202 cases of umbilical cord clip and 119 cases of valve core were observed.Results: The cure time of valve core group was shorter than the time of umbilical cord clip group obviously (P<0.05),and no umbilical cord complication happening.Conclusions: The value core ligation is better than umbilical cord clip ligation obviously,and it reduces the occurrence of umbilical inflammation,as well as convenient,effective and economical.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回