比较腹腔镜肝叶切除术中使用下腔静脉塌陷率与中心静脉压指导液体管理的效果

    Comparison the effect of fluid management guided by the rate of inferior vena cava collapse and central venous pressure during laparoscopic lobectomy

    • 摘要:
      目的: 比较下腔静脉塌陷率与中心静脉压(CVP)指导下液体管理在腹腔镜肝叶切除术中的临床效果。
      方法: 回顾性分析2022年4月至2025年4月行腹腔镜肝叶切除术130例病人资料,根据液体管理方法分为2组,中心组64例和下腔组66例,比较2组手术相关指标、血流动力学水平、肝肾功能、凝血功能以及术后并发症发生率。
      结果: 2组病人经干预后,肌酐(Cr)、尿素氮(BUN)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、总胆红素(TBIL)均较同组术前有所升高,凝血酶时间(TT)、活化部分凝血酶时间(APTT)也较术前延长,纤维蛋白原(FIB)降低(P < 0.01),术后3d,下腔组APTT、Cr、BUN、AST、TBIL水平低于中心组,FIB高于中心组(P < 0.01),且2组肝叶切除时、术毕的平均动脉压(MAP)均较同组术前有所降低,心率(HR)有所升高(P < 0.01),下腔组MAP高于中心组,HR低于中心组(P < 0.01)。而下腔组术中出血量、总输液量少于中心组,切肝时中心静脉压水平低于中心组(P < 0.05),但2组比较并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。
      结论: 相较于CVP指导液体管理,腹腔镜肝叶切除术中采用下腔静脉塌陷率指导更能够维持血流动力学稳定性,减少术中出血量,减轻对凝血功能和肝肾功能影响。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To compare the clinical effects of fluid management guided by inferior vena cava collapse rate and central venous pressure (CVP) in laparoscopic liver lobectomy.
      Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 130 patients treated with laparoscopic liver lobectomy from April 2022 to April 2025. According to the fluid management methods, the patients were divided into the central group (64 cases) and inferior lumen group (66 cases). The surgery-related indicators, hemodynamic levels, liver and kidney functions, coagulation functions and incidence of postoperative complications were compared between two groups. Resuls After intervention, the creatinine (Cr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and total bilirubin (TBIL) of the two groups were all increased compared with those before the operation in the same group. The thrombin time (TT) and activated partial thrombin time (APTT) were also prolonged compared with those before the operation, and the fibrinogen (FIB) decreased (P < 0.01). After 3 days of operation, the levels of APTT, Cr, BUN, AST and TBIL in the inferior lumen group were lower than those in the central group, and the FIB was higher than that in the central group (P < 0.01). Moreover, the mean arterial pressure (MAP) at the time of liver lobectomy and at the end of the operation in two groups was lower than that before the operation in the same group, and the heart rate (HR) was higher (P < 0.01). The MAP in the inferior lumen group was higher than that in the central group, the HR was lower than that of the central group (P < 0.01). However, the intraoperative blood loss and total infusion volume in the inferior lumen group were less than those in the central group, and the central venous pressure level during liver resection was lower than that in the central group (P < 0.05), but there was no statistical significance in the incidence of complications between two groups (P > 0.05).
      Conclusions Compared with CVP-guided fluid management, the use of inferior vena cava collapse rate guidance in laparoscopic liver lobectomy can better maintain hemodynamic stability, reduce intraoperative blood loss, and alleviate the impact on coagulation function and liver and kidney functions.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回