远视患者去调节散瞳后两种验光方法的对比观察

    Comparision of 2 types of optometry methods after the pupils of far-sighted sufferers were dilated

    • 摘要: 目的:探讨远视性屈光不正患者在去调节散瞳后采用电脑验光仪验光与带状光检影镜验光检测结果有无差异,了解电脑验光能否取代检影镜验光。方法:随机选取2006年就诊验光的25例远视患者,在去调节散瞳后,对每只眼随机先后采用电脑验光仪和带状光检影镜分别验光检测屈光不正的度数。所获数据进行统计学分析。结果:两种验光方法检测结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:电脑验光的结果还不够准确,它还不能取代检影验光,因电脑验光简便、快速,可为检影验光提供参考,并可用于屈光不正的群体普查工作。

       

      Abstract: Objective: To observe whether there exists difference in the test results of far-sighted ametropia sufferers' eyesight by computer optometry instruments and by streak retinoscope respetively after their pupils were dilated,and to know if the retinoscopy optometry can be replaced by computer optometry.Methods: Twenty-five far-sighted ametropia sufferers who had accepted optometry in 1996 in our hospital were selected at random.After their pulils were dilated,the computer optometry instrument and streak retinoscope were adopted respectively to test the ametropia degree;then the statistical data were analyzed.Results: Examination results by the two methods were significantly different(P<0.01).Conclusions: The test results by computer optometry is not exact.It denotes that the retinoscopy optometry can still not be replaced by computer optometry;as the latter is simple,easy and fast in operation,it can be used as a reference for the former,and applied in popular examination as well.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回