全身免疫炎症指数与急性缺血性脑卒中病人神经功能缺损严重程度和预后及TOAST分型相关性分析

    The correlation analysis between the systemic immune inflammation index and severity of neurological deficits, prognosis and TOAST classification in patients with acute ischemic stroke

    • 摘要:
      目的: 探究入院时全身免疫炎症指数(SII)与急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)病人神经功能缺损严重程度和90d的预后及急性卒中治疗Org 10172试验(TOAST)分型的相关性。
      方法: 回顾性分析2023年1—12月就诊于安徽省第二人民医院的AIS病人,收集病人实验室指标,并计算SII。记录病人基本资料、入院时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分和发病90d后的改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分。根据病人入院时NIHSS评分将病人分为轻度、中度、重度组,比较3组病人的基本资料及SII是否有差别。按发病90 d后的mRS评分将病人分为预后良好与预后不良组,比较2组病人的SII是否有差别。根据病人的临床症状及影像学检查结果综合评估,按TOAST分型分组,比较各亚型临床特征及SII水平。
      结果: AIS病人重度组的SII水平较中度组升高(P < 0.05),中度组的SII水平较轻度组升高(P < 0.05)。90d后随访,预后不良的AIS病人SII值及年龄较预后良好的AIS病人升高(P < 0.05)。比较不同TOAST分型组病人的临床特征及实验室指标,LAA组(大动脉粥样硬化型)和CE组(心源性栓塞型)入院时NHISS评分均高于SAO组(小动脉闭塞型)(P < 0.05)。
      结论: AIS病人SII水平越高其神经损伤越重。AIS病人年龄越大及SII水平越高,90d神经功能预后越不良,提示SII可作为评估病人病情严重程度和短期神经功能转归的生物标志物。TOAST各亚型间比较中,LAA组和CE组病人入院时神经功能缺损程度可能较SAO组重。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To explore the correlation between the systemic immune inflammation index (SII) at admission and severity of neurological deficits, prognosis at 90 days and classification of the Acute Stroke Treatment Org 10172 Trial (TOAST) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).
      Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on AIS patients who visited the Second People's Hospital of Anhui Province from January to December 2023. Thre laboratory indicators of patients were collected, and SII was calculated. The basic information of patients, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days after the onset of the disease were recorded. The patients were divided into the mild, moderate and severe groups based on the NIHSS score at admission. The basic information and SII among three groups were compared to find their any differences. The patients were divided into the good prognosis group and poor prognosis group according to the mRS Score at 90 days after the onset of the disease, and the difference of SII between two groups was compared. Based on the comprehensive assessment of the patients' clinical symptoms and imaging examination results, they were grouped according to the TOAST classification, and the clinical characteristics and SII levels of each subtype were compared.
      Results The SII level in the severe group was higher than that in moderate group (P < 0.05), and the SII level in the moderate group was higher than that in mild group (P < 0.05). After 90 days of follow-up, the SII value and age of AIS patients with poor prognosis were higher than those of AIS patients with good prognosis (P < 0.05). The clinical characteristics and laboratory indicators of patients in different TOAST classification groups were compared. The NHISS scores at admission in the LAA group (large artery atherosclerotic type) and CE group (cardiogenic embolism type) were both higher than those in the SAO group (small artery occlusion type) (P < 0.05).
      Conclusions The higher the SII level in AIS patients, the more severe the nerve damage. The older the age of AIS patients and higher the level of SII, the poorer the prognosis of neurological function at 90 days, suggesting that SII can be used as a biomarker for evaluating the severity of the patient's condition and short-term neurological function outcome. In the comparison among various subtypes of TOAST, the degree of neurological deficit at admission in the LAA group and CE group might be more severe than that in SAO group.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回