不同模式非生物型人工肝支持系统在肝衰竭病人治疗中的应用效果

    The application effects of different modes of non biological artificial liver support systems in the treatment of patients with liver failure

    • 摘要:
      目的: 评价血浆置换(PE)、血浆置换(PE) + 连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)及双重血浆分子吸附系统(DPMAS) + 半量血浆置换(HPE)模式在肝衰竭病人治疗中的应用效果。
      方法: 回顾性分析接受非生物型人工肝支持系统(NBAL)治疗的141例肝衰竭病人临床资料。按照人工肝治疗模式不同分为PE模式组(41例)、PE + CRRT模式组(48例)、DPMAS + HPE模式组(52例)。观察3组病人人工肝治疗前后的实验室指标、Meld评分、Child-pugh评分以及生存情况。
      结果: 与治疗前比较,3组病人治疗后丙氨酸氨基转移酶、总胆红素、凝血酶原时间、Meld评分及Child-pugh评分均明显下降(P < 0.05),凝血酶原活动度明显上升(P < 0.05);PE + CRRT模式组治疗后血钾浓度较治疗前上升(P < 0.05)、血氨和C反应蛋白较治疗前下降(P < 0.05);DPMAS + HPE模式组治疗后C反应蛋白、血红蛋白和血小板计数较治疗前均下降(P < 0.05)。3组病人1、3、6、9和12个月的生存率比较差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。
      结论: 3种人工肝治疗模式均可以有效改善肝衰竭病人肝功能、凝血功能、Meld评分及Child-pugh评分,PE + CRRT模式在调整电解质紊乱、清除血氨方面更具有优势,DPMAS + HPE模式对于血红蛋白和血小板具有一定影响,临床应结合病人病情,采取适合的治疗模式,提高治疗效果。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To evaluate the application effects of plasma exchange (PE), plasma exchange (PE) + continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and dual plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) + half volume plasma exchange (HPE) mode in the treatment of patients with liver failure.
      Methods The clinical data of 141 patients with liver failure treated with NBAL were analyzed retrospectively. According to the different treatment modes of artificial liver, the patients were divided into the PE model group (n = 41), PE + CRRT model group (n = 48) and DPMAS + HPE model group (n = 52). The laboratory index, Meld score, Child-pugh score and survival of three groups were observed before and after artificial liver treatment.
      Results Compared with those before treatment, the glutamic pyruvic transaminase, total bilirubin, prothrombin time, Meld score and Child-pugh score decreased significantly, and the prothrombin activity increased significantly in three groups after treatment (P < 0.05). In PE + CRRT model group, the serum potassium concentration increased (P < 0.05), and the blood ammonia and C-reactive protein decreased after treatment (P < 0.05). The C-reactive protein, hemoglobin and platelet count decreased after treatment in DPMAS + HPE mode group (P < 0.05). There was no statistical significance in the 1-, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-month survival rates among three groups (P < 0.05).
      Conclusions The three artificial liver treatment modes can effectively improve the liver function, blood coagulation function, Meld score and Child-pugh score of patients with liver failure. The PE + CRRT mode has more advantages in adjusting electrolyte disorder and removing blood ammonia. DPMAS + HPE mode has a certain effect on hemoglobin and platelets. Clinical treatment should be based on the patient's condition to improve the therapeutic effect. Clinical practice should combine the patient's condition to adopt an appropriate treatment model for improving the therapeutic effect.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回