结直肠癌术后病人中重度癌因性疲乏的预测模型构建

    Construction of prediction model for moderate and severe cancer fatigue in patients after colorectal cancer surgery

    • 摘要:
      目的: 探究结直肠癌术后病人中重度癌因性疲乏的影响因素并构建预测模型,为临床早期预防和干预提供指导。
      方法: 选取320例结直肠癌病人作为研究对象,根据是否发生中重度癌因性疲乏分为中重度组(n = 156)和非中重度组(n = 164),对影响结直肠癌术后病人中重度癌因性疲乏的因素进行单因素分析,将有统计学意义的变量(P < 0.05)构建logistic回归、决策树两种不同的预测模型,并比较两种模型的优劣。
      结果: logistic回归模型分析显示,体质量指数、睡眠质量、回避应对方式、社会支持水平是结直肠癌术后病人中重度癌因性疲乏的影响因素;决策树模型分析可知,心理弹性水平为中重度癌因性疲乏的主要因素,其次为社会支持水平、睡眠质量、回避应对方式。logistic回归模型和决策树模型的AUC分别为0.977和0.965,灵敏性分别为89.0%和85.4%,特异性分别为94.2%和96.2%,阳性预测值分别为95.6%和95.5%,阴性预测值分别为90.0%和87.4%,预测准确率分别为91.3%和90.6%。两个模型AUC值相比,差异无统计学意义(Z = 1.11,P > 0.05)。
      结论: logistic回归模型与决策树模型在预测结直肠癌术后病人中重度癌因性疲乏风险时均有一定的应用价值,建议将两种模型结合使用,以更好地指导临床实践。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To explore the influencing factors of moderate and severe cancer fatigue after colorectal cancer surgery and build a prediction model to provide guidance for early clinical prevention and intervention.
      Methods A total of 320 patients with colorectal cancer were selected as the study objects, and divided into the moderate to severe group (n = 156) and non-moderate to severe group (n = 164) according to whether moderate to severe cancer-related fatigue occurred. Univariate analysis was used to analyze the factors affecting the fatigue caused by moderate to severe cancer in patients after colorectal cancer surgery. Two different prediction models, logistic regression and decision tree, were constructed with statistically significant variables (P < 0.05), and the advantages and disadvantages of the two models were compared.
      Results The results of logistic regression model analysis showed that the BMI, sleep quality, avoidance coping style and social support level were the influencing factors of moderate to severe cancer fatigue after colorectal cancer surgery. The analysis of decision tree model showed that the level of mental resilience was the main factor of moderate to severe cancer-related fatigue, followed by the level of social support, sleep quality and avoidance coping style. The AUC of logistic regression model and decision tree model were 0.977 and 0.965, sensitivity 89.0% and 85.4%, specificity 94.2% and 96.2%, positive predictive value 95.6% and 95.5%, negative predictive value 90.0% and 87.4%, respectively. The prediction accuracy was 91.3% and 90.6% respectively. There was no statistical significance in the AUC values between two models (Z = 1.11, P > 0.05).
      Conclusions Both logistic regression model and decision tree model have certain application value in predicting the risk of cancer-induced fatigue. It is suggested to combine the two models and guide clinical practice better.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回