急性心肌梗死病人心肌声学造影对PCI术后心力衰竭的预警价值

    The early warning value of myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction for heart failure after PCI

    • 摘要:
      目的: 探讨急性心肌梗死(AMI)病人心肌声学造影(MCE)对经皮冠脉介入术(PCI)术后心力衰竭的预警价值。
      方法: 选取内江市第一人民医院拟行PCI术的AMI病人146例,依据术后6个月有无发生心力衰竭分组,比较2组一般资料及术前1 d超声心动图参数、MCE定量参数造影剂充填速度(β)、造影剂最大微泡数量(A)、心肌血流量(MBF),Pearson分析超声心动图参数与MCE定量参数相关性,绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析MCE定量参数预测效能,Delong检验曲线下面积(AUC)。
      结果: 与无心力衰竭组比较,心力衰竭组术前1 d 左心室射血分数(LVEF)、β、A、MBF较低,左心室收缩末期容积(LVESV)、左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)较高;心力衰竭病人术前1 dβ、A、MBF与LVEF呈正相关关系(P < 0.01),与LVESV、LVEDV呈负相关关系(P < 0.01);MBF + A + β联合预测心力衰竭发生价值近似LVEF + LVESV + LVEDV,且优于β、A、MBF单一预测价值(AUC:0.938 vs 0.937 vs 0.778 vs 0.768 vs 0.821)。
      结论: AMI–PCI术后心力衰竭病人β、A、MBF较低,与LVEF、LVESV、LVEDV有关,联合检测有助于提高心力衰竭预测效能,指导临床决策。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To investigate the early warning value of myocardial angiography (MCE) for heart failure after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
      Methods A total of 146 AMI patients scheduled for PCI in Neijiang First People's Hospital were selected, and divided into groups based on whether heart failure occurred after 6 months of operation. The general data and echocardiographic parameters and MCE quantitative parameterscontrast agent filling rate (β), maximum number of microbubbles in contrast agent (A), myocardial blood flow (MBF) at 1d before the operation were compared between two groups. The correlation between echocardiographic parameters and MCE quantitative parameters were analyzed using Pearson, the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was plotted to analyze the predictive efficacy of MCE quantitative parameters, and the area under the curve (AUC) was tested using Delong.
      Results Compared with the non-heart failure group, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), β, A, and MBF in the heart failure group were lower before one day of operation, while the left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) were higher. One day before the operation, the β, A and MBF of patients with heart failure were positively correlated with LVEF (P < 0.01), and negatively correlated with LVESV and LVEDV (P < 0.01). The combined predictive value of MBF + A + β for heart failure occurrence was similar to that of LVEF + LVESV + LVEDV, and superior to the single predictive value of β, A, and MBF (AUC: 0.938 vs 0.937 vs 0.778 vs 0.768 vs 0.821).
      Conclusions The levels of β, A and MBF in patients with heart failure after AMI-PCI are lower, which are related to the LVEF, LVESV and LVEDV. Combined detection is helpful to improve the predictive efficacy of heart failure and guide clinical decision-making.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回