不同发病年龄的青少年抑郁障碍病人血清炎症因子水平特点研究

    Study on the characteristics of serum inflammatory factor levels in adolescent patients with depressive disorders at different onset ages

    • 摘要:
      目的: 检测不同发病年龄的青少年抑郁障碍病人血清炎症因子水平差异及与临床特征的相关性。
      方法: 选择2023年1月至2024年6月住院治疗的13~18岁的青少年抑郁障碍病人,根据发病年龄,分为儿童组(<13岁)40例与青少年组(≥13岁)109例,同时选取30名健康青少年人群作为对照组。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD–17)、童年创伤量表(CTQ)评估临床特征,采用酶联免疫吸附试验法检测被试血清肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)–α、嗜酸细胞活化趋化因子(Eotaxin)–3因子浓度水平。
      结果: 3组被试病人年龄差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),儿童期发病的抑郁组病程大于青少年期发病组(P < 0.05),抑郁亚组间儿童期抑郁组CTQ总分和躯体虐待分大于青少年期抑郁组(P < 0.05),HAMD评分差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。控制年龄因素后,青少年期发病的TNF–α大于儿童期发病组(P < 0.05),抑郁亚组均小于正常对照组(P < 0.05),Eotain–3在三组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。相关性分析显示,抑郁组TNF–α与年龄呈正相关关系(r = 0.256,P < 0.01),Eotain–3浓度与HAMD评分呈正相关关系(r = 0.218,P < 0.01)。多因素logstic回归分析结果显示年龄、病程、TNF–α和躯体虐待因子是青少年抑郁障碍儿童期发病的影响因素(OR = 0.141、1.170、0.281和1.232,P < 0.01)。
      结论: 儿童期发病与青少年期发病的青少年抑郁障碍病人TNF–α存在差异,且TNF–α与年龄相关。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To investigate the differences of the serum levels of inflammatory factors among adolescent patients with depressive disorders at different onset ages, and their correlations with clinical characteristics.
      Methods The adolescent patients with depressive disorders aged 13 to 18 years who were hospitalized from January 2023 to June 2024 were selected. According to the age of onset, they were divided into the children group (<13 years old) with 40 cases and adolescent group (≥13 years old) with 109 cases. Meanwhile, 30 healthy adolescents were selected as the control group. The clinical characteristics were evaluated by the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) and Childhood Trauma Scale (CTQ), and the serum concentrations of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and eosinophil activating chemokine (Eotaxin)-3 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
      Results The differences of the age among the three groups were statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). The duration of depression in the childhood group was longer than that in the adolescent group (P < 0.05). Among the depression subgroups, the total CTQ score and physical abuse score in the childhood group were higher than those in the adolescent group (P < 0.05), while there was no statistical significance in the HAMD score (P > 0.05). After controlling the age factors, the TNF-α level in the adolescent group was higher than that in the childhood group (P < 0.05), and which in the depression subgroup was lower than that in normal control group (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in Eotain-3 among three groups (P > 0.05). The results of correlation analysis showed that in the depression group, the level of TNF-α was positively correlated with age (r = 0.256, P < 0.01), and the concentration of Eotain-3 was positively correlated with the HAMD score (r = 0.218, P < 0.01). The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the age, disease duration, TNF-α and physical abuse factors were the influencing factors of the onset of adolescent depressive disorder in childhood (OR = 0.141, 1.170, 0.281 and 1.232, P < 0.01).
      Conclusions There are differences in the TNF-α levels between adolescent patients with depressive disorders who develop the disease in childhood and those who develop it in adolescence, and the TNF-α is age-related.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回