BIM缺失多态性对EGFR–TKIs一线治疗EGFR19/21突变肺腺癌的疗效影响

    Effect of BIM deletion polymorphism on the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in first-line treatment of EGFR19/21 mutant lung adenocarcinoma

    • 摘要:
      目的: 探讨BIM缺失多态性对表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR–TKIs)治疗EGFR19/21突变肺腺癌的疗效影响。
      方法: 选取EGFR19/21突变不可手术或晚期肺腺癌病人98例,根据基因检测结果分为BIM缺失多态性与EGFR19/21共突变32例(共突变组)和EGFR19/21单突变66例(单突变组),所有病人均接受EGFR–TKIs(一代埃克替尼/吉非替尼或三代奥希替尼)治疗。口服治疗6周后疗效评估,记录最佳疗效,比较2组客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。采用Kaplan–Meier法进行生存分析,多变量Cox回归模型分析PFS和OS影响因素。
      结果: 共突变组和单突变组ORR分别为43.8%(14/32)、80.3%(53/66),DCR分别为71.9%(23/32)、92.4%(61/66),共突变组ORR和DCR均明显低于单突变组(P < 0.01)。共突变组和单突变组中位PFS分别为6.80个月(95%CI:1.81 ~ 11.79)和11.30个月(95%CI:9.06 ~ 13.54),中位OS分别23.80(95%CI:18.40 ~ 29.21)和31.50(95%CI:29.08 ~ 33.92),共突变组中位PFS、中位OS均低于单突变组(P < 0.05)。Cox回归分析显示,EGFR–TKIs种类(一代或三代)和BIM缺失多态性是接受EGFR–TKIs治疗PFS的独立危险因素(P < 0.05和P < 0.01),脑转移和BIM缺失多态性是接受EGFR–TKIs治疗OS的独立危险因素(P < 0.05和P < 0.01)。
      结论: BIM缺失多态性可以降低EGFR–TKIs一线治疗EGFR19/21突变肺腺癌疗效,是EGFR–TKIs治疗EGFR19/21突变肺腺癌病人独立预后不良因素。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To investigate the effect of BIM deletion polymorphism on the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in the treatment of EGFR19/21 mutant lung adenocarcinoma.
      Methods A total of 98 patients with inoperable or advanced lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR19/21 mutations were selected, and divided into two groups based on gene testing results: 32 patients with both BIM deletion polymorphism and EGFR19/21 co-mutations (co-mutation group) and 66 patients with EGFR19/21 single mutations (single mutation group). All patients received EGFR-TKIs (first-generation icotinib/gefitinib or third-generation osimertinib) treatment. After 6 weeks of oral treatment, the efficacy was evaluated, and the best response was recorded. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and multivariable Cox regression model was employed to analyze the factors influencing PFS and OS.
      Results The ORR in the co-mutation group and the single-mutation group was 43.8% (14/32) and 80.3% (53/66), respectively, and the DCR in the co-mutation group and the single-mutation group was 71.9% (23/32) and 92.4% (61/66), respectively. The ORR and DCR in the co-mutation group were obviously lower than those in the single-mutation group (P < 0.01). The median PFS in the co-mutation group and the single-mutation group was 6.80 months (95% CI: 1.81–11.79) and 11.30 months (95% CI: 9.06–13.54), respectively, and the median OS was 23.80 (95% CI: 18.40–29.21) and 31.50 (95% CI: 29.08–33.92), respectively. The median PFS and median OS in the co-mutation group were lower than those in the single-mutation group (P < 0.05). Cox regression analysis revealed that EGFR-TKI type (first-generation or third-generation) and BIM deletion polymorphism were independent risk factors for PFS in patients treated with EGFR-TKIs (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01), while brain metastasis and BIM deletion polymorphism were independent risk factors for OS in patients treated with EGFR-TKIs (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01).
      Conclusions BIM deletion polymorphism can reduce the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in first-line treatment of EGFR19/21 mutant lung adenocarcinoma, and is an independent adverse prognostic factor for EGFR-TKIs in the treatment EGFR19/21 mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回