应对方式在不稳定性心绞痛病人内感知与自我效能间的中介效应

    The mediating effect of coping styles between perception and self-efficacy in patients with unstable angina pectoris

    • 摘要:
      目的: 探讨应对方式(面对、回避、屈服)在不稳定性心绞痛(unstable angina,UA)病人内感知与自我效能间的中介效应。
      方法: 选取260 例UA病人,采用一般资料调查表、医学应对方式问卷(MCMQ)、内感受知觉多维评估问卷(MAIA–2)中文版及心脏健康自我效能与自我管理量表(HH–SESM)进行横断面调查。
      结果: UA 病人MCMQ面对、回避及屈服维度得分分别为(18.82 ± 6.72、16.45 ± 5.63、12.72 ± 4.56) 分,MAIA2得分为(21.16 ± 3.39)分;HH–SESM得分为(48.26 ± 6.72)分。相关分析显示,内感知及面对应对方式与自我效能呈正相关(r = 0.374、0.325,P < 0.01),回避应对方式与自我效能呈负相关(r = –0.381、P < 0.01),内感知与面对应对方式呈正相关(r = 0.359,P < 0.01),与回避应对方式呈负相关(r = –0.406,P < 0.01)。中介效应分析表明,面对应对方式和回避应对方式在内感知与自我效能间起部分中介作用,间接效应值分别为0.065(95%CI:0.028 ~ 0.118)和0.085(95%CI:0.041 ~ 0.142)(P < 0.01),中介效应占总效应的48.39%,屈服应对方式的中介效应无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。
      结论: 不稳定心绞痛病人自我效能处于中低水平,内感知与自我效能呈正相关,应对方式在该关系中存在部分中介效应;面对应对在内感知与自我效能的正向关联中可能发挥积极作用,建议制定以应对方式为核心的干预策略,鼓励病人采用面对应对,提高自我管理效能。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To explore the mediating effect of coping styles (confrontation, avoidance and submission) between perception and self-efficacy in patients with unstable angina (UA).
      Methods A total of 260 patients with UA were selected and a cross-sectional survey was conducted using the general information questionnaire, Medical Coping Styles Questionnaire (MCMQ), Chinese version of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA-2) and Heart Health Self-Efficacy and Self-Management (HH-SESM) Scale.
      Results The scores of the dimensions of confrontation, avoidance and submission of MCMQ in UA patients were 18.82 ± 6.72, 16.45 ± 5.63, and 12.72 ± 4.56) points, respectively. The score of MAIA2 was (21.16 ± 3.39) points, and the score of HH-SESM was (48.26 ± 6.72) points. The results of relevant analysis showed that the interoception and confrontation coping styles were positively correlated with self-efficacy (r = 0.374, 0.325, P < 0.01), while the avoidance coping styles were negatively correlated with self-efficacy (r = –0.381, P < 0.01), and the interoception is positively correlated with confrontation coping styles (r = 0.359, P < 0.01). It was negatively correlated with the avoidance coping style (r = –0.406, P < 0.01). The interoception was positively correlated with the confrontation coping style (r = 0.359, P < 0.01), and negatively correlated with the avoidance coping style (r = –0.406, P < 0.01). The mediating effect analysis indicated that the confrontational coping style and avoidant coping style played a partial mediating role between interoception and self-efficacy, with indirect effect values of 0.065 (95%CI: 0.028–0.118) and 0.085 (95%CI: 0.041–0.142), respectively (P < 0.01), the mediating effect accounted for 48.39% of the total effect, and the mediating effect of the yielding coping style was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).
      Conclusions The self-efficacy of patients with unstable angina pectoris is at a medium to low level. Interoception is positively correlated with self-efficacy, and coping styles have a partial mediating effect in this relationship. The coping may play a positive role in the positive correlation between interoception and self-efficacy. It is recommended to formulate intervention strategies centered on coping styles to encourage patients to adopt confrontational coping and improve self-management efficacy.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回