基于钼靶影像特征与临床因素构建BI–RADS 4A类乳腺肿块恶性风险列线图模型

    Construction of A nomogram model of malignant risk of BI-RADS type 4A breast masses based on the features of mammography images and clinical factors

    • 摘要:
      目的: 探讨基于钼靶影像特征联合临床因素构建的列线图模型在鉴别BI–RADS 4A类乳腺肿块良恶性的临床应用价值。
      方法: 回顾性分析2019年2月至2025年7月经乳腺X线摄影诊断为BI–RADS 4A类的180个乳腺肿块病人的临床及X线影像学资料。以病理结果为金标准,其中良性肿块92个,恶性88个。采用随机数字表法以7∶3的比例将肿块随机分入训练组(n = 125)和验证组(n = 55)。通过单因素及多因素logistic回归分析筛选良恶性鉴别的独立预测因素,并构建列线图模型。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线、校准曲线和临床决策曲线评估模型的性能。
      结果: 多因素logistic回归分析显示定量连续资料年龄及定性资料中肿块边缘是否光滑(是/否)、周边有无伴随征象(有/无)是鉴别BI–RADS 4A类乳腺肿块良恶性的独立预测因素。基于上述因素构建的列线图模型在训练组和验证组的ROC曲线下面积分别为 0.820(95%CI:0.747 ~ 0.893)和 0.816(95%CI:0.700 ~ 0.932),敏感度和特异度分别为93.2%、60.6%和89.7%、57.7%。校准曲线显示模型预测概率和实际值有良好一致性。临床决策曲线显示模型有较好临床实用性。
      结论: 基于乳腺钼靶影像特征与临床因素构建的列线图模型,可为BI–RADS 4A类乳腺肿块提供有效的个体化恶性风险评估,有助于优化临床决策。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To explore the clinical application value of a nomogram model constructed based on molybdenum target imaging features combined with clinical factors in differentiating benign and malignant BI-RADS type 4A breast masses.
      Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical and X-ray imaging data of 180 patients with breast masses diagnosed as BI-RADS 4A by mammography from February 2019 to July 2025. Taking the pathological results as the gold standard, there were 92 benign masses and 88 malignant ones. The masses were randomly divided into the training group (n = 125) and validation group (n = 55) at a ratio of 7:3 by the random number table method. The independent predictors for differentiating benign and malignant conditions were screened through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, and a nomogram model was constructed. The performance of the model was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve and clinical decision curve.
      Results The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the age in quantitative continuous data, and whether the edge of the mass was smooth (yes/no) and whether there were concomitant signs around (yes/no) in qualitative data were the independent predictors for differentiating benign and malignant BI-RADS type 4A breast masses. The areas under the ROC curves of the nomogram model constructed based on the above factors in the training group and the validation group were 0.820 (95%CI: 0.747–0.893) and 0.816 (95%CI: 0.700–0.932), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were 93.2%, 60.6% and 89.7%, 57.7%, respectively. The calibration curve shows that the predicted probability of the model was in good consistency with the actual value. The clinical decision curve showed that the model had good clinical practicability.
      Conclusions The nomogram model constructed based on the mammography imaging features and clinical factors of the breast can provide effective individualized malignant risk assessment for BI-RADS type 4A breast masses, and contribute to optimizing clinical decision-making.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回