输尿管上段结石的两种微创治疗方式比较

    Comparison of two micro-invasive surigical procedures for upper ureteral calculi

    • 摘要: 目的:比较输尿管镜碎石(URL)和经皮微穿刺碎石(mPCNL)治疗输尿管上段结石的疗效。方法:44例输尿管上段结石患者接受治疗,其中URL治疗23例(URL组),mPCNL治疗21例(mPCNL组)。结果:URL组术后1、6周结石清除率分别为34.8%和82.6%,mPCNL组分别为85.7%和95.2%,两组术后1周结石清除率差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),而术后6周差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:mPCNL组术后1周结石清除率明显高于URL组。当器械、技术条件具备时,mPCNL可以作为首选,而URL也是治疗输尿管上段结石的重要方法。

       

      Abstract: Objective: To compare the effects of minimal invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) and trans-urethral ureteroscope lithotripsy (URL)in management of upper ureteral calculi.Methods: Forty-four patients with upper ureteral stone were enrolled in the study.Twenty-three cases were treated by URL and 21cases by mPCNL.Results: In the URL group,the stone-free rates were 34.8% and 82.6% one week and six weeks after the operation respectively;in the mPCNL group,the stone free rates were 85.7% and 95.2% one week and six weeks after the operation respectively.The mPCNL group was superior to URL group in stone free rate one week after the operation (P<0.01),but the difference was not significant six weeks after the operation (P>0.05).Conclusions: High stone-free rate can be obtained by mPCNL for upper ureteral calculi.mPCNL may be the first choice,and URL is also of great use for treatment of upper ureteral stone.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回