肩袖损伤合并骨质疏松不同修补方式的有限元分析

    Finite element analysis of different repair methods for rotator cuff injury complicated with osteoporosis

    • 摘要:
      目的: 应用有限元方法比较分析锚钉不同的置钉方式在修复肩袖损伤合并骨质疏松时的生物力学差异。
      方法: 选择一名符合条件的老年肩袖损伤病人,根据其肩关节薄层CT以及锚钉数据建立五组不同置钉方式的三维模型,分别是传统缝线桥模型(A模型)、内排90°置钉模型(B模型)、四锚钉单交锁模型(C模型)、四锚钉双交锁模型(D模型)、三锚钉单交锁模型(E模型),对五组模型施加50N的载荷,比较并分析五组模型的应力分布变化,最后比较五组模型的极限载荷。
      结果: 90°置钉模型和交锁锚钉模型肱骨及锚钉的最大应力均低于传统缝线桥模型,而三组模型的极限载荷较传统缝线桥模型均有明显提升。三锚钉模型的肱骨最大应力与缝线桥模型相近,但锚钉的最大应力明显高于缝线桥模型,且三锚钉模型的极限载荷低于传统缝线桥模型。
      结论: 对于肩袖损伤合并有骨质疏松的老年病人而言,使用带有螺纹的锚钉进行肩袖修补时,90°置钉的方式相较于传统的45°置钉方式可有效减少肱骨以及锚钉所受的应力,增加锚钉的抗拔力。而内外排锚钉相交锁的方式,可在此基础上进一步提升锚钉的抗拔力,增强肩袖修补的稳定性。其中又以锚钉双交锁的方式提升最大。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To compare and analyze the biomechanical differences of different anchor nail placement methods in the repair of rotator cuff injury complicated with osteoporosis using the finite element method.
      Methods An eligible elderly patient with rotator cuff injury was selected, and five sets of three-dimensional models with different nailing methods were established according to the thin-slice CT and anchor data of shoulder joint, followed by the traditional suture bridge model (A model), internal 90° naddling model (B model), four-anchor single-locking model (C model), four-anchor double-locking model (D model), and three-anchor single-locking model (E model). 50N load was applied to the five groups of models, and the stress distribution changes of the five groups of models were compared and analyzed. Finally, the ultimate load of the five groups of models was compared.
      Results The maximum stress of humerus and anchor in the 90° pinning model and interlocking anchor model were lower than those in the traditional suture bridge model, and the ultimate load of three models was significantly higher than that in traditional suture bridge model (P > 0.05). The maximum humeral stress of three-anchor model was similar to that of the suture bridge model, but the maximum stress of anchor was significantly higher than that of suture bridge model, and the ultimate load of three-anchor model was lower than that of traditional suture bridge model (P > 0.05).
      Conclusions For elderly patients with rotator cuff injurycomplicated with osteoporosis, the 90° bolt placement method can effectively reduce the stress on the humerus and anchor bolts compared with the traditional 45° bolt placement method when using threaded anchor bolts for rotator cuff repair, and increase the uplift resistance of anchor bolts. The interlocking method of inner and outer row of anchor bolts can further enhance the uplift resistance of the anchor bolts on this basis, and improve the stability of rotator cuff repair. Among them, the method of double interlocking with anchor nails has the greatest improvement.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回