乳腺肿块的超声弹性成像与脉冲多普勒检查中硬度和血流的相关性分析

    Correlation analysis of hardness and blood flow in ultrasound elastography and pulse Doppler examination of breast masses

    • 摘要:
      目的: 比较应变弹性成像(SE)、剪切波弹性成像(SWE)和脉冲多普勒超声(PDU)对乳腺病变的诊断效能,并探讨病变硬度与血流之间是否具有相关性。
      方法: 85例乳腺病人于术前接受常规超声、PDU、SE和SWE检查。所有病人均于检查后1周内接受手术治疗。以术后病理结果为金标准,统计分析弹性评分(Score)、脂肪与肿块应变比(FLR)、腺体与肿块应变比(GLR),以及肿块的最大杨氏模量(Emax)、平均杨氏模量(Emean)、最小杨氏模量(Emin)、杨氏模量标准差(Esd)、收缩期峰值流速(PSV)、舒张末期流速(EDV)、搏动指数(PI)和阻力指数(RI)及其相关性。
      结果: 除Emin和EDV以外,乳腺恶性病变病人的其余弹性参数值均高于良性病变病人的参数值(P < 0.01)。Esd和PI的诊断效能最佳,AUC分别为0.881和0.877,但Esd和PI之间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。SWE中,Emax与PI和RI呈中度正相关(P < 0.01),Emean与PI和RI亦呈中正度相关(P < 0.01)。SE中,FLR与PI呈低度正相关(P < 0.01),与RI呈中度正相关(P < 0.01)。良性组中,各项弹性参数和血流参数之间无显著相关性(P > 0.05)。恶性组中,Emax、FLR与 RI均呈低度正相关(P < 0.05)。
      结论: 不同弹性成像和脉冲多普勒超声对乳腺良恶性病变的诊断效能相近。乳腺病变的弹性参数和血流参数之间存在一定的相关性,尤其在恶性病变中,乳腺病变的硬度特性和血流特征之间可能存在关联。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To compare the diagnostic efficacy of strain elastography (SE), shear wave elastography (SWE), and pulsed Doppler ultrasound (PDU) for breast lesions, and explore whether there is a correlation between lesion hardness and blood flow.
      Methods Eighty-five 85 patients with breast cancer were detected by routine ultrasound, PDU, SE and SWE before the operation. All patients were treated with surgery within one week after examination. Taking the postoperative pathological results as the gold standard, the elasticity score (Score), fat to mass strain ratio (FLR) and gland to mass strain ratio (GLR) were statistically analyzed. The correlations among the maximum Young's modulus (Emax), mean Young's modulus (Emean), minimum Young's modulus (Emin), standard deviation of Young's modulus (Esd), peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), pulsar index (PI) and resistance index (RI) of the mass were analyzed.
      Results Except for Emin and EDV, the values of remaining elastic parameters of patients with malignant breast lesions were all higher than those of patients with benign lesions (P < 0.01). The diagnostic efficacy of Esd and PI was the best, with AUCs of 0.881 and 0.877 respectively, but there was no statistical significance between Esd and PI (P > 0.05). In SWE, the Emax was moderately positively correlated with PI and RI (P < 0.01), and the Emean was also moderately positively correlated with PI and RI (P < 0.01). In SE, the FLR was low positive correlation with PI (P < 0.01), and moderate positive correlation with RI (P < 0.01). In the benign group, there was no significant correlation between various elastic parameters and blood flow parameters (P > 0.05). In the malignant group, the Emax, FLR and RI all showed a low positive correlation (P < 0.05).
      Conclusions The diagnostic efficacy of different elastography and pulsed Doppler ultrasound for benign and malignant breast lesions is similar. There is a certain correlation between the elastic parameters and blood flow parameters of breast lesions. Especially in malignant lesions, there may be a connection between the hardness characteristics and blood flow features of breast lesions.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回