CT引导下Hookwire定位与带线锚钩定位在肺结节手术的回顾性队列研究

    A retrospective cohort study of CT-guided Hookwire positioning and linear anchor hook positioning in pulmonary nodule surgery

    • 摘要:
      目的: 比较Hookwire定位针和带线锚钩用于肺结节术前定位的有效性和安全性。
      方法: 使用Hookwire定位针和带线锚钩分别对145例和150例肺结节病人进行术前定位。每组定位后24 h内行胸腔镜手术,比较2组的临床资料。
      结果: Hookwire定位针组共定位170例结节,带线锚钩组共定位180例结节;2种定位方式的结节定位成功均为100%,但与Hookwire定位针组相比,带线锚钩组术前定位所需时间少,气胸发生率较Hookwire定位针组低;穿刺后肺内出血发生率较Hookwire定位针组低;定位后疼痛持续时间较Hookwire定位针组少(P < 0.05 ~ P < 0.01)。
      结论: CT引导下带线锚钩术前定位效果好,安全,并发症发生率低,值得临床推广。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of Hookwire positioning needles and wire anchor hooks for preoperative positioning of pulmonary nodules.
      Methods The preoperative positioning was performed on 145 and 150 patients with pulmonary nodules using Hookwire positioning needles and anchor hooks with wires, respectively. Thoracoscopic surgery was performed within 24 hours after positioning in each group, and the clinical data between two groups were compared.
      Results A total of 170 nodules were located in the Hookwire positioning needle group, and 180 nodules were located in the wireline anchor hook group. The success rate of nodule localization for both positioning methods was 100%. However, compared with the Hookwire positioning needle group, the time required for preoperative localization in the wire anchor hook group was shorter, and the incidence of pneumothorax was lower than that in Hookwire positioning needle group. The incidence of intrapulmonary hemorrhage in the wire anchor hook group after puncture was lower than that in Hookwire positioning needle group. The duration of pain after positioning in the wire anchor hook group was shorter than that in Hookwire positioning needle group (P < 0.05 to P < 0.01).
      Conclusions The preoperative positioning effect of CT-guided anchor hooks with wires is good and safe, and has a low incidence of complications, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回