脊柱内镜BEIS技术经椎间孔入路治疗老年腰椎管狭窄症的效果观察

    Observation on the therapeutic effects of spinal endoscopic BEIS technique through intervertebral foramen approach in the treatment of elderly lumbar spinal stenosis

    • 摘要:
      目的: 探讨脊柱内镜BEIS技术治疗老年性腰椎管狭窄症的效果。
      方法:  选取老年性腰椎管狭窄症病人80例,按手术方式分为观察组45例和对照组35例。观察组采用脊柱内镜BEIS技术经椎间孔入路治疗,对照组采用传统开放手术治疗。比较2组病人手术切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、术后下床时间,比较2组手术前后腰痛及下肢疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和功能障碍指数(ODI)。
      结果:  与对照组比较,观察组病人手术切口更小,术中出血量更少,下床时间和住院时间均更短(P < 0.01)。2组病人术前VAS评分和ODI指数差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05);2组术后各时点VAS评分和ODI指数均较术前降低(P < 0.05),且观察组术后1、3个月VAS评分和ODI指数均明显低于对照组(P < 0.01)。
      结论:  脊柱内镜BEIS技术治疗老年腰椎管狭窄症创伤更小、恢复更快,疗效良好。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To investigate the effects of spinal endoscopic BEIS technique in the treatment of senile lumbar spinal stenosis.
      Methods Eighty elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis were divided into the observation group (45 cases) and control group (35 cases) according to different surgeries. The observation group were treated with the BEIS technique of spinal endoscopy through intervertebral foramen approach, and the control group were treated with traditional surgery. The size of the surgical incision, surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time and time out of bed after operation were compared between two groups. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and dysfunction index (ODI) of lower back pain and lower limb pain in two groups were compared between before and after operation.
      Results Compared with the control group, the surgical incision was small, the operation time, time out of bed after surgery and hospitalization time were shorter, and the intraoperative blood loss was less in the observation group (P < 0.05). There was no statistical significance in the preoperative VAS score and ODI index between two groups (P > 0.05). The VAS score and ODI index in two groups at all time points after operation were lower than those before surgery (P < 0.05), and the VAS score and ODI index in the observation group were significantly lower than those in control group at 1 and 3 months after surgery (P < 0.01).
      Conclusions The BEIS technique of spinal endoscopy in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly is less trauma, faster recovery, higher safety, and good therapeutic efficacy.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回