硬膜外阻滞麻醉与经皮神经电刺激无痛分娩效果观察

    Observation on the effect of epidural block anesthesia and percutaneous nerve electrical stimulation on painless delivery

    • 摘要:
      目的: 分析硬膜外阻滞麻醉与经皮神经电刺激2种无痛分娩方法效果及其对新生儿结局的影响。
      方法: 收集初产妇92例,随机分为对照组和观察组,各46例。对照组行硬膜外阻滞麻醉无痛分娩,观察组予以经皮神经电刺激,比较2组产程时间、产时疼痛评分、分娩方式、宫缩情况、产妇与新生儿结局。
      结果: 观察组产妇第一产程、第二产程和总产程所用时间均明显短于对照组(P < 0.01),2组第三产程时间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。镇痛前2组VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);观察组宫口打开5~6 cm、7~8 cm和宫口全开时VAS评分均明显高于对照组(P < 0.01)。2组产妇分娩方式差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),观察组阴道顺产率高于对照组,剖宫产率低于对照组。镇痛前2组宫缩持续时间和间隔时间差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05),宫口打开5~6 cm和宫口全开时,观察组宫缩持续时间和间隔时间均明显短于对照组(P < 0.01)。观察组产妇产后并发症总发生率为4.35%(2/46),明显低于对照组的23.91%(11/46)(P < 0.01);2组新生儿并发症发生情况和新生儿分娩后1、5、10 min Apgar评分差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。
      结论: 采用经皮电刺激进行无痛分娩,其镇痛效果逊于硬膜外麻醉镇痛,但能够缩短产程,对宫缩无抑制作用,有助于减少产后出血、尿潴留等并发症,在安全性方面更具优势。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To analyze the effect of two painless delivery methods including epidural block anesthesia and percutaneous nerve electrical stimulation and their effect on neonatal outcomes.
      Methods Ninety-two primiparous women were collected and randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 46 cases in each group. The control group received epidural block anesthesia for painless delivery, while the observation group received percutaneous nerve electrical stimulation. The duration of labor, pain score during labor, delivery method, uterine contraction, maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups.
      Results The time of the first stage of labor, second stage of labor and total stage of labor in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P < 0.01), and there was no significant difference in the time of the third stage of labor between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups before analgesia (P > 0.05); the VAS scores at the uterine opening 5-6 cm, 7-8 cm, and fully in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.01). The difference in delivery methods between the two groups of postpartum women was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The vaginal delivery rate was higher than that in the control group, and the cesarean section rate in the observation group was lower than that in the control group. There was no significant difference in the duration and interval of uterine contractions between the two groups before analgesia (P > 0.05), and the duration and interval of uterine contractions at the uterine opening 5-6 cm and fully in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P < 0.01). The total incidence of postpartum complications in the observation group was 4.35% (2/46), which was significantly lower than that of 23.91% (11/46) in the control group (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the incidence of neonatal complications and Apgar scores at 1, 5, and 10 minutes after delivery between the two groups (P > 0.05).
      Conclusions The analgesic effect of transcutaneous electrical stimulation in painless delivery is slightly inferior to that of epidural anesthesia, but percutaneous electrical stimulation can shorten the labor process, has no inhibitory effect on uterine contraction, helps to reduce the incidence of complications such as postpartum hemorrhage and urinary retention, and has more advantages in safety.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回