大学生CPR知识掌握情况及不同培训方案干预效果分析

    Analysis of the CPR knowledge among college students and intervention effects of different training programs

    • 摘要:
      目的 :了解某高校在校大学生心肺复苏术(CPR)知识与技能的掌握情况,分析不同培训方案的干预效果。
      方法 :采用方便抽样法,选取安徽医科大学452名本科生作为研究对象进行问卷调查,调查其CPR知识与技能掌握情况以及接受培训的意愿。同时,招募129名志愿者,依据培训前CPR实操考核成绩分为视频自学模式组、传统实操教学模式组和VR模拟场景教学模式组,各43名,分析不同培训方案的干预效果。
      结果 :调查结果显示,仅有14.60%的学生CPR掌握情况调查得分及格,93.36%的学生均愿意主动参与CPR培训。3组培训前CPR考核得分无统计学差异(P > 0.05),培训后CPR考核得分均明显高于培训前(P < 0.01);培训后,传统实操教学模式组和VR模拟场景教学模式组CPR考核得分均高于视频自学模式组(P < 0.05)。
      结论 大学生CPR的掌握情况不容乐观,但大学生参与CPR培训的意愿较强。本研究中CPR的三种培训方法之中,传统实操教学和VR模拟场景教学模式的教学效果相似,二者相对于视频自学模式更为有效。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To investigate the mastery of knowledge and skills of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) among college students, and analyze the intervention effects of different training programs.
      Methods Using a convenient sampling method, 452 undergraduate students from Anhui Medical University were selected as research subjects to conduct a questionnaire survey. The mastery of CPR knowledge and skills and willingness to receive training among the students were investigated. At the same time, 129 volunteers who met the inclusion criteria were recruited, and divided into the video self-study mode group, traditional practice teaching mode group and VR simulation scene teaching mode group according to the performance of CPR practice before the training (43 cases each group), and the intervention effects of different training programs were analyzed.
      Results The results showed that only 14.60% of the students passed the CPR mastery survey, and 93.36% of the students were willing to actively participate in CPR training. There was no statistical significance in the CPR test scores among three groups before training (P > 0.05), and the scores after training were significantly higher than those before training (P<0.01). After the training, the CPR test scores in the traditional practical teaching mode group and VR simulation scene teaching mode group were higher than those in video self-study mode group (P < 0.05).
      Conclusions The mastery of CPR among college students is not optimistic, but their willingness to participate in CPR training is strong. Among the three training methods for CPR in this study, the teaching effects of traditional practical teaching mode and VR simulation scene teaching are similar, and both are more effective than video self-study mode.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回