输尿管软镜碎石术术后无结石状态评估模型的构建

    Construction of an assessment model for the state without stones after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy

    • 摘要:
      目的: 探究输尿管软镜碎石术(FURL)术后治疗效果相关的危险因素,并构建新评分模型来预测FURL术后的结石清除率(SFR)。
      方法: 回顾性分析接受首次FURL治疗的上尿路结石病人的临床资料,同时统计一期术后SFR。通过单因素分析和多元logistic回归分析得出独立预测因素,绘制列线图并根据列线图相关参数的权重为每个参数分配分数,以此构建一个新评分模型。利用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)比较该评分模型与STONE评分的预测性能。
      结果: 本研究共纳入247例病人,其中结石清除组157例(63.6%),结石残留组90例(36.4%)。单因素分析显示结石数目、结石长径、结石面积、结石密度和结石位置对FURL术后SFR均有影响(P < 0.01)。多元logistic回归分析显示:结石面积、结石密度、结石位置为影响FURL术后SFR的独立预测因素(P < 0.05~P < 0.01),以此建立AUC为0.808的列线图及新评分模型。新评分模型的AUC为0.775,而STONE评分的AUC为0.640。
      结论: 结石面积、结石密度、结石位置是影响FURL术后治疗效果的因素,以上述3个指标构建的新评分模型能够作为FURL术后SFR评估的一种有效手段,可为临床决策提供参考。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To explore the risk factors related to the therapeutic effects after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL), and construct a new scoring model to predict the stone clearance rate (SFR) after FURL.
      Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of upper urinary tract calculi patients with treated with FURL, and the SFR after the first stage of surgery was simultaneously calculated. The independent predictors were obtained through single-factor analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis. A nomogram was drawn and scores were assigned to each parameter based on the weights of the relevant parameters in the nomogram, thereby a new scoring model was constructed. The predictive performance between scoring model and STONE score was compared using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC).
      Results A total of 247 patients were included in this study, among which 157 cases (63.6%) were in the stone clearance group and 90 cases (36.4%) were in the stone residue group. The results of univariate analysis showed that the number of stones, long diameter of stones, area of stones, density of stones and position of stones all had an impact on the SFR after FURL surgery (P < 0.01). The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the stone area, stone density and stone location were independent predictors of SFR after FURL (P < 0.05 to P < 0.01). Based on this, a nomogram with an AUC of 0.808 and a new scoring model were established. The AUC of the new scoring model was 0.775, while that of the STONE score was 0.640.
      Conclusions The stone area, stone density and stone location are the factors affecting the therapeutic effect after FURL. The new scoring model constructed based on the above three indicators can be used as an effective means for evaluating SFR after FURL and can provide a reference for clinical decision-making.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回