临床护士作为双师型教师数字能力潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究

    A Study on the potential profile analysis and influencing factors of digital competence among clinical nurses as dual-qualified teachers

    • 摘要:
      目的: 探讨临床护士作为双师型教师数字能力现状、潜在剖面及影响因素,为管理者提升临床护士的数字能力并制订针对性干预策略提供个性化参考。
      方法: 采用自编一般资料问卷、临床护士数字能力调查问卷、一般自我效能感量表及职业结果期待量表对安徽省21家医院临床护士进行调查,对临床护士数字能力进行潜在剖面分析,并通过单因素分析和多元logistic回归分析探讨临床护士数字能力不同剖面分类的影响因素。
      结果: 临床护士数字能力总均分为(3.88 ± 0.44)分,识别出潜能待启型(17.5%)、持续精进型(57.5%)、优势引领型(25.0%)3个剖面;多元logistic回归分析显示,以潜能待启型为参照组,在持续精进型vs潜能待启型的比较中,不同最高学历、职称、是否参与过医院信息化/数字化培训、一般自我效能感和职业结果预期均为不同类别临床护士数字能力的影响因素(P < 0.01),在优势引领型vs潜能待启型的比较中,不同职称、是否参与过医院信息化/数字化培训、一般自我效能感和职业结果预期为不同类别临床护士数字能力的影响因素(P < 0.01)。
      结论: 临床护士数字能力存在异质性,建议医院管理者根据临床护士数字能力的不同分类特征实施干预,以提高数字能力水平。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To explore the current status, potential profiles, and influencing factors of clinical nurses' digital competence as dual-qualified teachers, providing personalized references for administrators to enhance the digital competence of clinical nurses and develop targeted intervention strategies.
      Method A self-designed general information questionnaire, a clinical nurse digital competence survey questionnaire, a general self-efficacy scale, and an occupational outcome expectation scale were used to survey clinical nurses in 21 hospitals in Anhui Province. A potential profile analysis was conducted on the digital competence of clinical nurses, and the influencing factors of different profile classifications of clinical nurses' digital competence were explored through univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis.
      Result The total mean score of clinical nurses' digital competence was (3.88 ± 0.44) points, and three profiles were identified: potential-to-be-unlocked type (17.5%), continuous improvement type (57.5%), and strength-driven type (25.0%). Through multiple logistic regression analysis, taking the potential-to-be-unlocked type as the reference group, in the comparison between the continuous improvement type and the potential-to-be-unlocked type, different highest education levels, professional titles, participation in hospital information/digital training, general self-efficacy, and career outcome expectations were significant influencing factors for the digital competence among clinical nurses in different categories (P < 0.01). In the comparison between the strength-driven type and the potential-to-be-unlocked type, different professional titles, participation in hospital information/digital training, general self-efficacy, and career outcome expectations were significant influencing factors for the digital competence among clinical nurses in different categories (P < 0.01).
      Conclusions There is heterogeneity in the digital competence of clinical nurses. It is recommended that hospital administrators implement interventions based on the different classification characteristics of clinical nurses' digital competence to improve their level of digital competence.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回