四变量评分对成人中重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的筛查效能及其改良

    Screening efficacy and improvement of four-variable score for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea in adults

    • 摘要:
      目的: 评估四变量评分对中重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的筛查效能,并对四变量评分进行改良,同时评价改良四变量评分联合腰高比(WHtR)的筛查价值。
      方法: 选取108例疑似中重度OSA病人作为研究对象,完整填写四变量评分及进行整夜多导睡眠监测监测。根据睡眠呼吸低通气指数(AHI)将病人分为中重度OSA患病组和非患病组,通过增加并调整年龄截断值、性别和年龄评分值、四变量评分总分截断值,计算量表的AUC、约登指数、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV),评价改良四变量评分的筛查效能,最后与WHtR联合诊断,确定WHtR截断值。
      结果: 四变量评分对中重度OSA筛查的约登指数、AUC、敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV分别是0.36、0.68、96.39%、40.00%、84.2%、76.9%,改良四变量评分(男性得2分,年龄>45岁得2分,其余筛查问题及评分标准不变)≥11分时,获得较高的约登指数和AUC,分别是0.47和0.73,联合WHtR后获得最优的约登指数、AUC分别为0.62、0.81。
      结论: 原始四变量评分对中重度OSA的筛查效果一般,但使用改良四变量评分可以获得较好的筛查效能,建议总分以≥11分作为截断值,同时建议和WHtR联合诊断,改良版四变量评分≥11分且WHtR>0.50者为中重度OSA高风险病人。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To evaluate the screening efficiency of four variable score for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and improve it, and evaluate the screening value of four variable score combined with waist to height ratio (WHtR).
      Methods A total of 108 patients suspected by moderate to severe OSA were selected as the study objects, the four-variable score was completely completed, and the polysomnea monitoring was performed all night. According to the sleep hypopnea index (AHI), the patients were divided into the moderate and severe OSA group and non-OSA group. The screening efficacy of modified four-variable score was evaluated by increasing and adjusting the cut-off value of age, gender and age scores, and cut-off value of the total score of four variables, AUC, Yoden index, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the scale. The WHtR cut-off value was determined by combined diagnosis with WHtR
      Results The Yoden index, AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of four variable score for moderate to severe OSA screening were 0.36, 0.68, 96.39%, 40.00%, 84.2% and 76.9%, respectively. When the improved four variable score (male score = 2 points, age >45 years old score = 2 points and other screening questions and scoring criteria remaining unchange) was ≥11 points, the higher Yoden index and AUC were obtained, which were 0.47 and 0.73, respectively. When the four variable score was combined with WHtR, the optimal Yoden index and AUC were obtained, which were 0.62 and 0.81, respectively.
      Conclusions The original four-variable score has a general screening effect on moderate to severe OSA, but the improved four-variable score can be used to obtain better screening efficacy. It is recommended that the total score ≥11 points should be set as the cut-off value, and the combined diagnosis with WHtR is recommended. Patients with improved four-variable score ≥11 points and WHtR>0.50 are the high-risk patients with moderate to severe OSA

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回