免疫检查点抑制剂致皮肤不良反应预防和管理的循证实践

    Evidence-based practice for the prevention and management of cutaneous immune-related adverse events induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors

    • 摘要:
      目的: 基于最佳证据构建免疫检查点抑制剂致皮肤不良反应(cutaneous immune–related Adverse Events,cirAEs)预防和管理的循证实践方案并评价其应用效果。
      方法: 总结cirAEs预防和管理的最佳证据,以i– PARIHS知识转化模式为指导、结合临床情境对最佳证据进行筛选,制订循证实践方案,将证据应用于临床实践。选取安徽省某三级甲等医院肿瘤内科病区23名护士作为研究对象,考察其对审查指标的执行情况,护士采用自身前后对照;选取2023年11月至2024年4月接受ICIs治疗的病人65例作为基线审查组(对照组),2024年5—10月为循证实践时间,纳入病人62例(观察组),采用非同期对照比较循证实践的效果。循证实践前后分别对2组病人及护士,从过程、结果、结构指标三方面对证据转化效果进行评价。
      结果: 护士的审查指标执行率由0~47.7%上升至78.3%~100%(P < 0.01),护士对cirAEs知识的合格率由25%提升至85%(P < 0.01);与对照组相比,观察组病人cirAEs的严重程度减低,症状负担、皮肤病生活质量指数、生活质量均改善,上报时间缩短及上报准确率提高,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05 ~ P < 0.01)。
      结论: cirAEs预防和管理循证实践的开展为临床决策提供了依据,提高了医护人员的知识水平和审查指标的执行率,有效降低了病人cirAEs的严重程度,提升了cirAEs上报效率,改善了病人的生活质量。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To develop an evidence-based practice protocol for the prevention and management of cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors based on the best available evidence and evaluate its application effect.
      Methods Summarizing the best evidence for the prevention and management of cirAEs, and guided by the i-PARIHS knowledge translation model in combination with clinical context, this study screened the best evidence and developed an evidence-based practice protocol, and implemented the evidence into clinical practice. A total of 23 nurses from the oncology ward of a tertiary grade A hospital in Anhui Province were selected as the study subjects to evaluate their compliance with review indicators, applying pre-post self-comparison. Sixty-five patients receiving ICIs treatment from November 2023 and April 2024 were selected as a baseline review group (control group), with May to October 2024 as the evidence-based practice period, and 62 patients (observation group) were enrolled, applying non-concurrent comparison to evaluate the evidence-based practice's effectiveness. The patients and nurses in the two groups were assessed for evidence translation outcomes in terms of process, outcome, and structural indicators before and after the evidence-based practice.
      Results The implementation rate of review indicators of nurse increased from 0–47.7% to 78.3%–100% (P < 0.01), and the qualification rate of nurses' knowledge of cirAEs increased from 25% to 85% (P < 0.01). Compared with the control group, the patients in the observation group showed a decrease in the severity of cirAEs, improvement in symptom burden, dermatology life quality index, and quality of life, shortened reporting time, and improved reporting accuracy, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05 to P < 0.01).
      Conclusions Implementing the evidence-based practice for cirAEs prevention and management provided references for clinical decision-making, enhanced healthcare professionals' knowledge level and compliance with revies indicators, effectively reduced the severity of cirAEs, improved reporting efficiency for cirAEs, and enhanced patients’ quality of life.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回