基于机器学习的晚期非小细胞肺癌PD–1及多模式治疗疗效预测模型构建与验证

    Construction and validation of the PD-1 and multimodal therapeutic efficacy prediction model for advanced non-small cell lung cancer based on machine learning

    • 摘要:
      目的: 探讨基于治疗方案、CT影像特征和临床资料的机器学习模型对晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)近期疗效的预测价值。
      方法: 回顾性收集2020年1月至2025年4月151例晚期NSCLC病人,2020年1月至2023年12月的96例病人按6∶4比例随机分为训练集和测试集1,2024年1月至2025年4月的55例病人作为独立测试集2。收集治疗方案、临床基线及CT影像学特征,分别构建随机森林、极端梯度提升树、轻量级梯度提升机(LGBM)及逻辑回归模型,并采用ROC曲线、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)评估模型性能。
      结果: LGBM模型在训练集、测试集1和测试集2的AUC分别为0.741、0.750和0.727,AUC波动范围为0.023,小于随机森林(0.235)和XGBoost(0.312);测试集1和测试集2准确性分别为0.759和0.618,敏感性分别为0.882和0.828。DeLong检验显示,LGBM与逻辑回归在3个数据集中的AUC差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05),结合校准曲线和DCA提示其稳定性及临床净获益较好。
      结论: 整合PD–1治疗状态、CT影像特征及临床基线的机器学习模型可用于晚期NSCLC近期疗效预测,其中LGBM模型在内部及外部测试中表现较稳定;SHAP分析提示吸烟史、病灶长径及PD–1治疗状态是影响疗效判断的重要因素,可为个体化治疗决策提供参考。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To explore the predictive value of machine learning model based on treatment regimens, CT imaging features and clinical data for the short-term efficacy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
      Methods A retrospective collection was made of 151 patients with advanced NSCLC from January 2020 to April 2025. Among them, 96 patients from January 2020 to December 2023 were randomly divided into the training set andtest set at a ratio of 6:4. Fifty-five patients from January 2024 to April 2025 were used as the independent test set. The treatment regimens, clinical baselines and CT imaging features were collected. The random forest, extreme gradient boosting tree, lightweight gradient boosting machine (LGBM) and logistic regression models were constructed. ROC curve, calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the performance of the models.
      Results  The AUC of the LGBM model in the training set, test set 1 and test set 2 was 0.741, 0.750 and 0.727, respectively, and the AUC fluctuation range was 0.023, which was smaller than that of Random forest (0.235) and XGBoost (0.312). The accuracies of test Set 1 and test Set 2 were 0.759 and 0.618, respectively, and the sensitivities were 0.882 and 0.828, respectively. The DeLong test showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the AUC between LGBM and logistic regression in the three datasets (P > 0.05). Combined with the calibration curve and DCA, it suggested that its stability and clinical net benefit were better.
      Conclusions The machine learning model integrating PD-1 treatment status, CT image features and clinical baseline can be used for the short-term efficacy prediction of advanced NSCLC. Among them, the LGBM model shows relatively stable performance in internal and external tests. The results of SHAP analysis suggests that smoking history, long diameter of the lesion and PD-1 treatment status are the important factors affecting the judgment of therapeutic effect, which can provide a reference for individualized treatment decisions.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回