两种规格二级滤过膜在ABO血型不相容肾移植预处理中的对比研究

    A comparative study of two specifications of secondary filtration membranes in the pretreatment of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation

    • 摘要:
      目的: 对比分析EC–30W(孔径0.02 μm)和EC–40W(孔径0.03 μm)两种不同孔径的二级滤过膜在ABO血型不相容肾移植(ABO–incompatible kidney transplantation, ABOi–KT)预处理中的应用特点。
      方法: 采用肾移植科双重血浆滤过(double filtration plasmapheresis, DFPP)预处理行ABOi–KT受者的临床资料,按采用的二级滤过膜类型分为30W组(25例)和40W组(21例),对比2组受者DFPP相关参数、ABO血型抗体滴度变化以及术后血肌酐水平,并分析2组受者首次DFPP前后血浆大分子物质浓度的变化情况。
      结果: 2组进行DFPP共计115次,均未出现严重并发症;2组受者的DFPP次数和血浆处理量均无显著差异(P > 0.05),30W组首次DFPP的弃浆量、白蛋白用量、二级膜跨膜压力均显著高于40W组(P < 0.01);2组白蛋白血浆浓度在首次DFPP后差异无明显统计学意义(P > 0.05),前白蛋白、IgG和IgM分子的血浆浓度均显著降低,30W组的下降率分别为21.18% ± 6.15%、55.39% ± 4.13%和73.41% ± 8.55%,40W组的下降率分别为14.87% ± 4.53%、34.20% ± 4.88%和74.66% ± 6.66%;2组受者预存ABO血型抗体均顺利清除至安全标准(IgM、IgG滴度均≤1∶8),术后均未发生严重并发症,移植肾功能良好出院,术后1个月血肌酐水平的组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。
      结论: 两种不同孔径的二级滤过膜均能选择性清除大分子物质,根据目标分子的分子量个体化选择二级滤过膜,可以实现DFPP清除效果和医疗成本的最优化;对ABO血型抗体以IgM型为主的ABOi–KT受者,采用大孔径二级滤过膜进行预处理是安全可行的。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To compare the characteristics of two types of plasma component separators with different pore size (EC-30W pore diameter = 0.02 μm, EC-40W pore diameter = 0.03 μm) in the desensitization of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOi-KT).
      Methods The clinical data of ABOi-KT recipients desensitized by double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) in the department of renal transplantation of the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China were retrospectively analyzed. The ABOi-KT recipients were divided into the 30W group (n = 25) and 40W group (n = 21) according to the type of secondary filtration membrane adopted. The DFPP-related parameters, changes in ABO blood group antibody titers and postoperative serum creatinine levels between two groups were compared, and the changes in plasma macromolecular substance concentrations before and after the first DFPP in the two groups of recipients were analyzed.
      Results A total of 115 DFPP sessions were performed in two groups, and no serious complications occurred. There was no significant difference in the frequency of DFPP and plasma processing volume between two groups (P > 0.05). The amount of plasma discarded in the first DFPP, dosage of albumin and transmembrane pressure of the secondary membrane in the 30W group were significantly higher than those in the 40W group (P < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the plasma concentration of albumin between two groups after the first DFPP (P > 0.05), while the plasma concentrations of prealbumin, IgG and IgM molecules decreased significantly. The decrease rates in the 30W group were 21.18% ± 6.15%, 55.39% ± 4.13% and 73.41% ± 8.55%, respectively, and which in the 40w group were 14.87% ± 4.53%, 34.20% ± 4.88% and 74.66% ± 6.66%%, respectively. The pre-stored ABO blood group antibodies in two groups were successfully cleared to the safety standard (Both IgM and IgG titers were ≤1 : 8). No serious complications occurred after the operation, and the recipients were discharged with good transplant renal function. There was no statistically significant difference in the serum creatinine level between two groups after 1 month of operation (P > 0.05).
      Conclusions Both secondary filtration membranes with different pore sizes can selectively remove macromolecular substances. Selecting the secondary filtration membrane based on the molecular weight of the target molecule can optimize the removal effect and medical cost of DFPP. For ABOi-KT recipients with ABO blood group antibodies mainly of IgM type, pretreatment using large-pore secondary filtration membranes is safe and feasible.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回