维持性血液透析病人社会衰弱变化轨迹及影响因素的纵向研究

    Longitudinal study of social frailty in maintenance hemodialysis patients and its influencing factors

    • 摘要:
      目的: 探索维持性血液透析病人社会衰弱变化轨迹并分析其影响因素。
      方法: 选取诊断为终末期肾病行透析治疗的210例维持性血液透析病人为研究对象。采用一般资料问卷、中文版社会衰弱指数量表及心理弹性评定量表分别在首次透析、透析1月、透析3月、透析6月、透析12月进行问卷调查。采用潜类别增长模型及单因素分析进行数据处理。
      结果: 识别出维持性血液透析病人社会衰弱轨迹分为3个潜在类别,每个类别的维持性血液透析病人归属于各个潜在类别的平均概率分别为0.946、0.910,0.948。3个类别分别为高水平加重组(30.1%)、中水平改善组(51.9%)、中低水平平稳组(18.0%)。不同轨迹类别在自评性格类型方面比较,内向型与中间型比较、内向型与外向型比较、中间型与外向型比较,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05 ~ P < 0.01)。
      结论: 维持性血液透析病人首次透析到规律透析12月内的社会衰弱呈现出3种不同的轨迹类型,病人社会衰弱轨迹存在差异。临床工作人员应密切关注高水平加重组的透析病人,及时识别社会衰弱的高危病人,以降低社会衰弱带来的影响,并提供积极的、有针对性的保护性护理。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To explore the trajectory of social frailty in maintenance hemodialysis patients and analyze its influencing factors.
      Methods A total of 210 maintenance hemodialysis patients diagnosed with end-stage renal disease were selected as the study objects. The patients were investigated using the general data questionnaire, Chinese version of Social frailty Index Scale and CD-RISC in the first dialysis and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months of dialysis. The latent category growth model and single factor analysis were used for data processing.
      Results The social frailty trajectory of maintenance hemodialysis patients was identified into three potential categories, and the average probability of each category belonging to each potential category was 0.946, 0.910, 0.948, respectively. The three categories were high level aggravating group (30.1%), medium level improvement group (51.9%) and low level stabilization group (18.0%). There were statistically significant differences in self-rated personality types among different trajectory categories, including introversion and intermediate type, introversion and extroversion, and intermediate type and extroversion (P < 0.05 ~ P < 0.01).
      Conclusions The social frailty of maintenance hemodialysis patients within 12 months from the first dialysis to regular dialysis presents three different trajectories, and the trajectories of social frailty of patients are different. Clinical staff should pay close attention to high level aggravating dialysis patients, timely identify high-risk patients with social faltering, in order to reduce the impact of social faltering, and provide active and targeted protective care.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回