• 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 安徽省优秀科技期刊
  • 中国高校优秀期刊

不同途径给予咪达唑仑临床效果比较

沈亮, 傅维安, 范秋维, 于布为

沈亮, 傅维安, 范秋维, 于布为. 不同途径给予咪达唑仑临床效果比较[J]. 蚌埠医科大学学报, 2004, 29(2): 128-130.
引用本文: 沈亮, 傅维安, 范秋维, 于布为. 不同途径给予咪达唑仑临床效果比较[J]. 蚌埠医科大学学报, 2004, 29(2): 128-130.
SHEN Liang, FU Wei-an, FAN Qiu-wei, YU Bu-wei. Comparison of the clinical effects of midazolam through different ways of administration[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical University, 2004, 29(2): 128-130.
Citation: SHEN Liang, FU Wei-an, FAN Qiu-wei, YU Bu-wei. Comparison of the clinical effects of midazolam through different ways of administration[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical University, 2004, 29(2): 128-130.

不同途径给予咪达唑仑临床效果比较

详细信息
    作者简介:

    沈亮(1970-),男,浙江宁波人,主治医师.

  • 中图分类号: R971.4

Comparison of the clinical effects of midazolam through different ways of administration

  • 摘要: 目的: 比较静脉、肌肉、滴鼻、舌下四种途径给予咪达唑仑的临床效果。方法: ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ级择期手术患者40例,按不同给药途径随机分成静脉组(V组)、肌肉组(M组)、鼻腔内滴注组(N组)、舌下含服组(S组)。各组依不同途径给予咪达唑仑,观察镇静(OAA/S)程度、BIS指数、VAS评分及记忆情况。结果: 镇静(OAA/S)程度:各组达到3级满意率为V、M组70%,N、S组30%。BIS值:V、M、N、S组分别在用药后5 min、25 min、35 min、35 min逐渐下降,BIS值分别维持在84.3±2.17、89.9±1.23、91.1±0.84、91.3±0.61水平。VA S评分:V、M、N组在用药后均低于治疗前(P<0.05~P<0.01)。遗忘情况:V、M、N、S组产生完全遗忘的百分率间差异有显著性(P<0.005)。结论: 四种途径给予咪达唑仑50 μg/kg,V、M组产生的临床效果优于N、S组。
    Abstract: Objective: To study the effect of midazolam through different ways of administration.Methods: Forty ASA Ⅰ to Ⅱ patients scheduled for elective surgery were enrolled in this study.They were randomly divided into four groups with 10 cases in each group.They were intravenous group(V group),intramuscular group(M group),intranasal group(N group) and subligual group(S group).Each group was given midazolam 50 μg/kg for premedication by different ways of administration.The depth of sedation was monitored by BIS and modified by OAA/S sedation score,VAS score and amnesia.Results: The OAA/S score:70% of the patients in two groups(V,M) became unconscious.However,only 30% of the patients in the other groups(N,S) became unconscious.The BIS index decreased to 84.3±2.17 in V group,89.9±1.23 in M group,91.1±0.84 in N group and 91.3±0.61 in S group.The BIS index in group(V,M,N,S) decreased slightly 5 min,25 min,35 min and 35 min after administration.There were significant changes in the VAS score after giving premedication in V,M and N group(P<0.05 to P<0.01).The percentage of amnesia changed significant(P<0.01).Conclusions: The effects of sedation and amnesia of midazolam administered in a dose of 50 μg/kg are better in V and M groups than in N and S groups.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  3210
  • HTML全文浏览量:  359
  • PDF下载量:  20
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2003-06-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回