吴金萍. 某医学院校麻醉学专业学生人文素质发展性评价调查[J]. 蚌埠医科大学学报, 2016, 41(4): 537-538. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.04.036
    引用本文: 吴金萍. 某医学院校麻醉学专业学生人文素质发展性评价调查[J]. 蚌埠医科大学学报, 2016, 41(4): 537-538. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.04.036
    WU Jin-ping. Research on developmental evaluation of humanistic quality in medical students[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical University, 2016, 41(4): 537-538. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.04.036
    Citation: WU Jin-ping. Research on developmental evaluation of humanistic quality in medical students[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical University, 2016, 41(4): 537-538. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.04.036

    某医学院校麻醉学专业学生人文素质发展性评价调查

    Research on developmental evaluation of humanistic quality in medical students

    • 摘要: 目的:了解医学生人文素质现状,评价医学院校人文素质教育得失,提出改善路径。方法:使用《医学生人文素质发展性评价调查问卷》为调查工具,采用分层整群抽样方法对某医学院校麻醉学专业一年级、三年级和五年级学生进行问卷自评。自评内容包括人文素质发展性评价指标体系中的4个一级指标,10个二级指标和27个三级指标。结果:3个年级医学生人文素质发展性评价一级指标自评优良率从高到低依次是人文精神、人文思想、人文方法和人文知识,且人文知识、人文思想和人文方法评分差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05~P< 0.01)。评分较低的前3个二级指标依次为基础知识、执行能力和思维观念。结论:该校的人文素质教育是有成效的,但学校仍需加强医学生人文基础知识的学习,提升学生信息处理和解决问题的能力以及创新性观念和思维。

       

      Abstract: Objective: To understand the current situation of humanistic quality in medical students, to evaluate the gains and losses of humanistic quality education in the medical college and to put forward the improvement path. Methods: 'Humanistic quality of medical students developmental evaluation questionnaire' was adopted to investigate the students of grade one, grade three and grade five about the humanity quality evaluation indicators by using stratified cluster sampling survey. The assessment included 4 first class indicators, 10 second class indicators and 27 third class indicators. Results: The self-evaluation score of humanities quality indicators in the medical student of the three grades from high to low in turn were the humanistic spirit, humanistic thought, humanistic approach and humanity knowledge;and the difference was significant among the humanity knowledge, humanistic thought and humanistic approach(P<0.05 to P<0.01). The basic knowledge, executive ability and thinking acquired lower scores among the second class indicators. Conclusions: The humanistic quality education of the school is effective. But the school still needs to carry out targeted education to strengthen the students' humanistic knowledge, improve their information-processing and problem-solving ability and cultivate their innovative ideas and thinking.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回