赵磐琳, 庞春元, 张硕, 石缨. 高龄不孕女性应用不同促排卵方案的妊娠率及妊娠结局比较[J]. 蚌埠医科大学学报, 2017, 42(5): 616-619. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2017.05.016
    引用本文: 赵磐琳, 庞春元, 张硕, 石缨. 高龄不孕女性应用不同促排卵方案的妊娠率及妊娠结局比较[J]. 蚌埠医科大学学报, 2017, 42(5): 616-619. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2017.05.016
    ZHAO Pan-lin, PANG Chun-yuan, ZHANG Shuo, SHI Ying. Effect of different ovarian stimulation programs on pregnancy rate and outcome in older infertile women[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical University, 2017, 42(5): 616-619. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2017.05.016
    Citation: ZHAO Pan-lin, PANG Chun-yuan, ZHANG Shuo, SHI Ying. Effect of different ovarian stimulation programs on pregnancy rate and outcome in older infertile women[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical University, 2017, 42(5): 616-619. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2017.05.016

    高龄不孕女性应用不同促排卵方案的妊娠率及妊娠结局比较

    Effect of different ovarian stimulation programs on pregnancy rate and outcome in older infertile women

    • 摘要: 目的:分析4种不同促排卵方案对高龄女性妊娠率及妊娠结局的影响。方法:选取拟行体外受精-胚胎移植的高龄不孕女性448例为研究对象,根据自愿选择的原则,按照不同的促排卵方案,将研究对象分为微刺激方案组(微刺激组)、短方案组、拮抗剂方案组(拮抗剂组)和改良长效长方案组(长方案组)。比较4组胚胎学数据及妊娠率和妊娠结局。结果:4组促排卵方案使用促性腺激素时间、促性腺激素量及获卵数均表现为:长方案组> 短方案组、拮抗剂组> 微刺激组(P< 0.01);优胚率表现为:短方案组、微刺激组均大于拮抗剂组、长方案组(P< 0.05)。4组妊娠率、异位妊娠率和流产率差异均无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。结论:微刺激方案能用较少药物、较短时间获得较高的优胚率,但在妊娠率方面无明显优势。临床仍应根据具体情况个体化选择促排卵方案。

       

      Abstract: Objective: To analyze the effects of four kinds of ovarian stimulation programs on pregnancy rate and outcome in older infertile women.Methods: Four hundred and forty-eight older infertile women scheduled by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer were selected.Following the principle of voluntary choice,the patients were divided into the micro-stimulation program group,short program group,antagonist program group and improved long-term porogram group according to the different ovulation stimulation programs.The embryological data,pregnancy rate and outcome between four groups were compared.Results: The using time and number of Gn,and dosage oocytes in improved long-term program group were more than those in short program group,and in antagonist program group were more than those in micro-stimulation program group(P<0.01).The excellent embryo rates in short program group and micro-stimulation program group were more than those in antagonist program group and improved long-term program group(P<0.05).The differences of the pregnancy rate,abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate between four groups were not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusions: The micro-stimulation program can reduce drug use,shorten the time of harvesting high excellent embryo rate,but has not obvious advantages in pregnancy rate.Selecting ovarian stimulation program should refer to the concrete condition of patients in clinic.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回