赵翠英, 刘永刚, 连俊勤, 邹起瑞, 彭檀. 上气道狭窄部位手术配合持续气道内正压通气治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征临床分析[J]. 蚌埠医科大学学报, 2011, 36(6): 594-595.
    引用本文: 赵翠英, 刘永刚, 连俊勤, 邹起瑞, 彭檀. 上气道狭窄部位手术配合持续气道内正压通气治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征临床分析[J]. 蚌埠医科大学学报, 2011, 36(6): 594-595.
    ZHAO Cui-ying, LIU Yong-gang, LIAN Jun-qin, ZOU Qi-rui, PENG Tan. Upper respiratory stenosis surgery combining with continuous positive airway pressure for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical University, 2011, 36(6): 594-595.
    Citation: ZHAO Cui-ying, LIU Yong-gang, LIAN Jun-qin, ZOU Qi-rui, PENG Tan. Upper respiratory stenosis surgery combining with continuous positive airway pressure for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical University, 2011, 36(6): 594-595.

    上气道狭窄部位手术配合持续气道内正压通气治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征临床分析

    Upper respiratory stenosis surgery combining with continuous positive airway pressure for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

    • 摘要: 目的: 观察上气道狭窄部位手术配合持续气道内正压通气(CPAP)治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)的疗效。方法: 将80例OSAS患者随机均分成2组,其中,对照组仅施行上气道狭窄部位鼻腔和咽腔相应的手术;综合治疗组准确判定上气道阻塞平面,施行鼻腔和咽腔狭窄部位相应的手术,并辅以CPAP治疗。结果: 术后随访0.5年,经多睡眠监测判定,综合治疗组显效19例,有效16例,无效5例,有效率为87.5%;对照组显效7例,有效18例,无效15例,有效率为62.5%;综合治疗组疗效优于对照组(P < 0.05)。结论: OSAS患者行上气道狭窄部位手术配合CPAP治疗,疗效显著,优于对照组,值得推广。

       

      Abstract: Objective: To study the curative effects of upper respiratory stenosis surgery in combination with continuous positive airway pressure(CPAP) in treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome(OSAS). Methods: Eighty OSAS patients were romdomly divided into two groups:combined modality therapy group and control group. The control group received the surgery on the upper respiratory stenosis of nasal and pharynx cavity; the combined modality therapy group received surgery on the stenosis of nasal and pharynx cavity on the basis of accurate judgment of the upper respiratory obstructive flat with the assistance of CPAP therapy. Results: All the cases were followed up fro 6-12 months. The outcomes were assessed by polysomnogruphy. In the combination therapy group,the effects were excellent in 19 cases,fair in 16 cases and invalid in 5 cases. The total response rate was 87.5%. In the control group,the effect was excellent in 7 cases,fair in 18 cases and invalid in 15 cases. The total response rate was 62.5%. The difference was significant(P < 0.05). Conclusions: The combination therapy of upper respiratory stenosis surgery and CPAP has significant advantages in treatment of OSAS and is worth popularizing.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回