陈欣. 鼻内镜辅助与直视支撑喉镜下切除声带息肉的疗效比较[J]. 蚌埠医科大学学报, 2011, 36(6): 571-573.
    引用本文: 陈欣. 鼻内镜辅助与直视支撑喉镜下切除声带息肉的疗效比较[J]. 蚌埠医科大学学报, 2011, 36(6): 571-573.
    CHEN Xin. Comparison of suspension laryngoscopy in nosal endoscope surgery and euthyphoria surgery for treatment of vocal cord polyps[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical University, 2011, 36(6): 571-573.
    Citation: CHEN Xin. Comparison of suspension laryngoscopy in nosal endoscope surgery and euthyphoria surgery for treatment of vocal cord polyps[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical University, 2011, 36(6): 571-573.

    鼻内镜辅助与直视支撑喉镜下切除声带息肉的疗效比较

    Comparison of suspension laryngoscopy in nosal endoscope surgery and euthyphoria surgery for treatment of vocal cord polyps

    • 摘要: 目的: 比较鼻内镜辅助支撑喉镜与直视支撑喉镜下切除声带息肉的疗效,探讨声带息肉手术方式的选择。方法: 对80例声带息肉患者分别采用鼻内镜辅助支撑喉镜(鼻内镜组)与直视支撑喉镜下(直视组)切除,其中鼻内镜组41例,直视组39例。术后随访3个月,比较2组的疗效。结果: 鼻内镜组切除声带息肉有效率95.12%高于直视组的76.92%(P < 0.05)。结论: 鼻内镜辅助支撑喉镜下切除声带息肉效果优于直视支撑喉镜下手术,值得临床推广。

       

      Abstract: Objective: To compare the therapeutic effects of the suspension laryngoscope in nosal endoscope surgery and euthyphoria surgery for treatment of vocal cord polyps,and to discuss the choice of surgical procedures. Methods: The clinical data of 80 patients with vocal cord polyps were analyzed retrospectively. Forty-one of the cases received the resection using the suspension laryngoscope with the aid of nosal endoscope(nosal endoscope group) and 39 cases received euthyphoria surgery(euthyphoria group). All the cases were followed up for 3 months. The clinical effects of the two procedures were compared. Results: The clinical effect of nosal endoscope group was significantly better than that of the euthyphoria group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The procedure of using the suspension laryngoscope with the aid of nosal endoscope is superior to the euthyphoria procedure in treatment of vocal cord polyps,and is worth popularizing.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回