• 中国科技论文统计源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国高校优秀期刊
  • 安徽省优秀科技期刊
CHEN Jing, LIU Li-hua, MA Sheng-yin, GAO Jun, GONG Feng. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous endovascular angioplasty in the treatment of arteriovenous graft stenosis: analysis of patency rate in 36 patients at a single center[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical University, 2023, 48(4): 486-489. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2023.04.016
Citation: CHEN Jing, LIU Li-hua, MA Sheng-yin, GAO Jun, GONG Feng. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous endovascular angioplasty in the treatment of arteriovenous graft stenosis: analysis of patency rate in 36 patients at a single center[J]. Journal of Bengbu Medical University, 2023, 48(4): 486-489. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2023.04.016

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous endovascular angioplasty in the treatment of arteriovenous graft stenosis: analysis of patency rate in 36 patients at a single center

More Information
  • Received Date: December 01, 2020
  • Revised Date: August 25, 2021
  • ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness and feasibility of ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty(PTA)in the treatment of arteriovenous graft(AVG)stenosis, and analyze the influencing factors of patency rate after PTA.
    MethodsThe inner diameter of stenosis, hemodialysis blood flow, brachial artery blood flow changes in 36 maintenance hemodialysis patients with AVG stenosis before and after PTA were retrospectively analyzed, and the therapeutic effects were evaluated.The patency rate was detected every 3 months after surgery.
    ResultsAll 36 patients were successfully operated.Before the treatment of PTA, the diameter of stenosis, AVG blood flow and brachial artery blood flow were(1.58±0.35)mm, (144.13±19.12)mL/min and(352.30±42.01)mL/min, respectively.After the treatment of PTA, the diameter of stenosis, AVG blood flow and brachial artery blood flow were(3.71±0.62)mm, (275.75±14.29)mL/min and(616.83±45.92)mL/min, respectively.The differences of the diameter of stenosis, AVG blood flow and brachial artery blood flow between before and after treatment were statistically significant(P < 0.01), and which indicated that the treatment was effective.The patients were followed up for 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, and the primary patency and secondary patency rates were 80.6%, 66.7%, 47.2% and 38.9%, and 88.9%, 75.0%, 69.4% and 58.3% at each time-point, respectively.There was no statistical significance at each follow-up time between primary patency rate and secondary patency rate(P>0.05).The age of patients with postoperative 1 year patency was lower than that of patients with postoperative 1 year non-patency(P < 0.01).
    ConclusionsThe PTA guided by ultrasound is an effective method in the treatment of AVG stenosis, and the older the patient is, the lower the postoperative patency rate is.
  • [1]
    金其庄, 王玉柱, 叶朝阳, 等. 中国血液透析用血管通路专家共识(第2版)[J]. 中国血液净化, 2019, 18(6): 365. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4091.2019.06.001
    [2]
    MOUSA AY, PATTERSON W, ABU-HALIMAH S, et al. Patency in arteriovenous grafts in hemodialysis patients[J]. Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2013, 47(6): 438. doi: 10.1177/1538574413493678
    [3]
    BACHLEDA P, UTIKAL P, KOCHER M, et al. Arteriovenous graft for hemodialysis, graft venous anastomosis closure-current state of knowledge. Minireview[J]. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub, 2015, 159(1): 27. doi: 10.5507/bp.2014.027
    [4]
    李宁, 彭侃夫. 维持性血液透析病人发生动静脉内瘘栓塞的危险因素分析[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2017, 42(11): 1510. doi: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2017.11.023
    [5]
    VALERIANOVA A, KUDLICKA J, CHYTILOVA E, et al. Factors influencing dialysis arteriovenous graft survival[J]. J Vasc Access, 2017, 18(2): 139. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000632
    [6]
    PISONI RL, ZEPEL L, PORT FK, et al. Trends in US vascular access use, patient preferences, and related practices: an update from the US DOPPS practice monitor with international comparisons[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2015, 65(6): 905. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.12.014
    [7]
    ARHUIDESE IJ, ORANDI BJ, NEJIM B, et al. Utilization, patency, and complications associated with vascular access for hemodialysis in the United States[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2018, 68(4): 1166. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.049
    [8]
    AGARWAL AK, HADDAD NJ, VACHHARAJANI TJ, et al. Innovations in vascular access for hemodialysis[J]. Kidney Int, 2019, 95(5): 1053. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.11.046
    [9]
    MASUD A, COSTANZO EJ, ZUCKERMAN R, et al. The complications of vascular access in hemodialysis[J]. Semin Thromb Hemost, 2018, 44(1): 57. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606180
    [10]
    GLANZ S, GORDON D, BUTT KM, et al. Dialysis access fistulas: treatment of stenoses by transluminal angioplasty[J]. Radiology, 1984, 152(3): 637. doi: 10.1148/radiology.152.3.6235537
    [11]
    彭嘉欣, 万恒, 刘正军. 经皮腔内血管成形术治疗人工血管移植物内瘘狭窄或闭塞的疗效[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2019, 28(12): 1497. doi: 10.7659/j.issn.1005-6947.2019.12.009
    [12]
    赵意平, 郭相江, 施娅雪, 等. 高压球囊治疗人工血管动静脉内瘘狭窄的初步体会[J]. 中国血液净化, 2015, 14(1): 25. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGJH201501008.htm
    [13]
    缪鹏, 谭正力, 田然, 等. 外周切割球囊在血液透析通路血管狭窄的临床应用研究[J/CD]. 中国血管外科杂志: 电子版, 2019, 11(2): 104.
    [14]
    PLANKEN RN, VAN KESTEREN F, REEKERS JA. Treatment of hemodialysis vascular access arteriovenous graft failure by percutaneous intervention[J]. J Vasc Access, 2014, 15(7_suppl): 114. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000234
    [15]
    OH E, KIM YJ, GOO DE, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for dysfunctional femoral hemodialysis graft[J]. Diagn Interv Radiol, 2015, 21(2): 154. doi: 10.5152/dir.2014.14231
    [16]
    PARK J, KIM J, HWANG S, et al. Arteriovenous graft patency outcomes and prognostic factors[J]. Vascular, 2019, 27(2): 128. doi: 10.1177/1708538118807844
    [17]
    曾敏, 杨定平, 郑婷. 超声引导下经皮球囊扩张术治疗内瘘狭窄的疗效观察[J]. 临床肾脏病杂志, 2019, 19(1): 23. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCSB201901005.htm
    [18]
    丁红, 顾奇澜, 朱宇莉, 等. 高频超声监测稳定血透患者动静脉内瘘并发症的临床价值再评价[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2015, 26(2): 118. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LYYX201502013.htm

Catalog

    Article views (1535) PDF downloads (5) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return